Cybersecurity: Network Monitoring Program Needs Further Guidance and Actions
Government Accountability Office06/11/2025
Fast Facts
The Department of Homeland Security's Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) program gives agencies cybersecurity tools to strengthen the networks and systems they use to meet their missions.
While the program has met two of its goals, it lacks sufficient guidance for managing network security and data protection. The program generally supports government-wide cybersecurity initiatives, but DHS's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency hasn't finalized all plans for how CDM can provide support. For example, the agency hasn't fully updated the program's cloud asset management guidance.
We recommended DHS address these issues.
Highlights
What GAO Found
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) established the Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) program in 2012 to strengthen the cybersecurity of government networks and systems. Its goals are to: (1) reduce exposure to insecure configurations or known vulnerabilities; (2) improve federal cybersecurity response capabilities; (3) increase visibility into the federal cybersecurity posture; and (4) streamline Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA) reporting. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) manages these goals across four capability areas (see figure). The program is meeting two of its four goals and partially meeting the other two, as discussed below.
CDM has met two goals. First, it is reducing exposure to insecure configurations and known vulnerabilities—22 of 23 agencies reported that the program was helpful in accomplishing this. CDM is also meeting its incident response capability goal.
The program, however, has been less successful in meeting the other two goals.
Although CISA developed dashboards to visualize and provide insight to the federal cybersecurity posture and the associated capability areas noted above, officials from 21 of 23 agencies stated that they had not yet fully implemented network security and data protection capabilities. Several agencies cited a lack of guidance as contributing to the slow implementation.
While officials from four agencies stated that CDM helped to automate FISMA reporting, officials from seven other agencies said that data quality issues were adversely affecting efforts to streamline reporting leading to manual updates to correct data errors.
Regarding supporting other initiatives, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) established expectations that CDM would support federal cybersecurity efforts on zero trust architecture, endpoint detection and response, and cloud asset management. CDM has generally met expectations for the zero trust architecture program. However, CISA had not finalized key activities to support endpoint detection and cloud asset management. CISA's actions to implement an endpoint solution for all agencies and issue updated guidance on cloud asset management would improve the cybersecurity posture of federal agencies.
Why GAO Did This Study
A key aspect of a rigorous cybersecurity program is continuously monitoring networks and systems to identify and manage risks. Consistent with the FISMA requirement for agency network monitoring, the CISA-led CDM program provides tools to agencies to assist in this effort.
FISMA includes a provision for GAO to periodically report on agencies' implementation of the act. Among its objectives, this report examines the extent to which the CDM program is (1) meeting its goals, and (2) supporting other federal cybersecurity initiatives.
GAO selected for review the 23 civilian agencies covered in the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (CFO Act). GAO compared CDM program documentation against relevant guidance, and summarized survey results from the 23 civilian CFO Act agencies. GAO also interviewed CISA and OMB officials.
Recommendations
GAO is making four recommendations to DHS and CISA to (1) issue guidance on implementing network security and data protection capabilities, (2) address data quality issues, (3) implement an endpoint solution, and (4) issue updated guidance on cloud asset management. DHS, on behalf of CISA, concurred with the recommendations.
GAO Contacts
Jennifer Franks Director Information Technology and Cybersecurity franksj@gao.govMedia Inquiries
Sarah Kaczmarek Managing Director Office of Public Affairs media@gao.govPublic Inquiries
Contact UsTopics
Information SecurityCybersecurityInformation securityChief financial officersAsset managementData qualityHomeland securityPerformance monitoringCritical infrastructure protectionFederal agenciesOperations and maintenanceRecommendations
GAO is making four recommendations to DHS and CISA to (1) issue guidance on implementing network security and data protection capabilities, (2) address data quality issues, (3) implement an endpoint solution, and (4) issue updated guidance on cloud asset management. DHS, on behalf of CISA, concurred with the recommendations.