U01MH129968
Cooperative Agreement
Overview
Grant Description
The impacts of county-level COVID-19-related public health and social policies on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in mental health and healthcare utilization - Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and related mitigating measures have brought on tremendous financial hardship for vulnerable Americans, with nearly 15% unemployment at its peak and millions falling into poverty. There have been striking racial and socioeconomic disparities in these hardships, particularly for Black and Latinx families, which build on longstanding inequities in income, housing, and other social determinants of health.
Recent research has demonstrated the impact of the pandemic and its resulting socioeconomic inequities on disparities in mental health and healthcare utilization. It is increasingly recognized that policies play a role in mitigating or exacerbating these disparities. For example, mandated closures lead to job and income loss, which disproportionately affect low-income and minority women. Conversely, economic support policies ensure that vulnerable families have the resources to stay healthy at home.
While some studies have examined the effects of state-level COVID-19-related policies, there has been little systematic documentation of county-level policies and their effects on disadvantaged groups. The goal of this study is to leverage, expand upon, and link existing national datasets to test the hypothesis that county-level public health and social policies have affected disparities in mental health and healthcare utilization.
In Aim 1, we will gather county-level COVID-19-related policy data for 2020-2021 for a nationwide sample of 250 counties, selected to ensure coverage of over half of the U.S. population as well as diversity in racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and urban/rural composition. Policies will be drawn from online sources and grouped into 3 domains chosen due to likely impacts on mental health and utilization: (1) containment and closure, (2) economic support, and (3) public health. We will characterize geographic and temporal variation in county-level policies and make this database freely available.
In Aim 2, we will examine which county-level COVID-19-related policies contributed to or ameliorated pandemic-related disparities in mental health and health behaviors, linking the policy database from Aim 1 with national health surveys that provide individual-level data on self-reported psychological distress, smoking, alcohol use, and illicit drug use.
In Aim 3, we will estimate the association of county-level COVID-19-related policies with disparities in healthcare utilization for mental health problems, linking the policy database from Aim 1 with national datasets that provide individual-level data on healthcare utilization. Aims 2 and 3 exploit temporal and geographic variation in county-level policies and employ quasi-experimental methods to estimate policy effects.
Conducted in close collaboration with other SBECCC investigators, the expected outcome of this research is the creation of a county-level policy database that will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and stakeholders working to understand how local policies contributed to and continue to influence pandemic-related health disparities, as well as specific evidence on policy effects on mental health outcomes. This will guide policies and interventions to reduce mental health burden, especially for vulnerable communities.
The COVID-19 pandemic and related mitigating measures have brought on tremendous financial hardship for vulnerable Americans, with nearly 15% unemployment at its peak and millions falling into poverty. There have been striking racial and socioeconomic disparities in these hardships, particularly for Black and Latinx families, which build on longstanding inequities in income, housing, and other social determinants of health.
Recent research has demonstrated the impact of the pandemic and its resulting socioeconomic inequities on disparities in mental health and healthcare utilization. It is increasingly recognized that policies play a role in mitigating or exacerbating these disparities. For example, mandated closures lead to job and income loss, which disproportionately affect low-income and minority women. Conversely, economic support policies ensure that vulnerable families have the resources to stay healthy at home.
While some studies have examined the effects of state-level COVID-19-related policies, there has been little systematic documentation of county-level policies and their effects on disadvantaged groups. The goal of this study is to leverage, expand upon, and link existing national datasets to test the hypothesis that county-level public health and social policies have affected disparities in mental health and healthcare utilization.
In Aim 1, we will gather county-level COVID-19-related policy data for 2020-2021 for a nationwide sample of 250 counties, selected to ensure coverage of over half of the U.S. population as well as diversity in racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and urban/rural composition. Policies will be drawn from online sources and grouped into 3 domains chosen due to likely impacts on mental health and utilization: (1) containment and closure, (2) economic support, and (3) public health. We will characterize geographic and temporal variation in county-level policies and make this database freely available.
In Aim 2, we will examine which county-level COVID-19-related policies contributed to or ameliorated pandemic-related disparities in mental health and health behaviors, linking the policy database from Aim 1 with national health surveys that provide individual-level data on self-reported psychological distress, smoking, alcohol use, and illicit drug use.
In Aim 3, we will estimate the association of county-level COVID-19-related policies with disparities in healthcare utilization for mental health problems, linking the policy database from Aim 1 with national datasets that provide individual-level data on healthcare utilization. Aims 2 and 3 exploit temporal and geographic variation in county-level policies and employ quasi-experimental methods to estimate policy effects.
Conducted in close collaboration with other SBECCC investigators, the expected outcome of this research is the creation of a county-level policy database that will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and stakeholders working to understand how local policies contributed to and continue to influence pandemic-related health disparities, as well as specific evidence on policy effects on mental health outcomes. This will guide policies and interventions to reduce mental health burden, especially for vulnerable communities.
Funding Goals
THE MISSION OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH (NIMH) IS TO TRANSFORM THE UNDERSTANDING AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESSES THROUGH BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, PAVING THE WAY FOR PREVENTION, RECOVERY, AND CURE. IN MAY 2020, NIMH RELEASED ITS NEW STRATEGIC PLAN FOR RESEARCH. THE NEW STRATEGIC PLAN BUILDS ON THE SUCCESSES OF PREVIOUS NIMH STRATEGIC PLANS BY PROVIDING A FRAMEWORK FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION, AND ADDRESSING NEW CHALLENGES IN MENTAL HEALTH. THE NEW STRATEGIC PLAN OUTLINES FOUR HIGH-LEVEL GOALS: GOAL 1: DEFINE THE BRAIN MECHANISMS UNDERLYING COMPLEX BEHAVIORS GOAL 2: EXAMINE MENTAL ILLNESS TRAJECTORIES ACROSS THE LIFESPAN GOAL 3: STRIVE FOR PREVENTION AND CURES GOAL 4: STRENGTHEN THE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT OF NIMH-SUPPORTED RESEARCH THESE FOUR GOALS FORM A BROAD ROADMAP FOR THE INSTITUTE'S RESEARCH PRIORITIES OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BEGINNING WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE OF THE BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, AND EXTENDING THROUGH EVIDENCE-BASED SERVICES THAT IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH OUTCOMES. THE INSTITUTE'S OVERALL FUNDING STRATEGY IS TO SUPPORT A BROAD SPECTRUM OF INVESTIGATOR-INITIATED RESEARCH IN FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE, WITH INCREASING USE OF INSTITUTE-SOLICITED INITIATIVES FOR APPLIED RESEARCH WHERE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT IS A SHORT-TERM MEASURE OF SUCCESS. THE NEW STRATEGIC PLAN ALSO ADDRESSES A NUMBER OF CROSS-CUTTING THEMES THAT ARE RELEVANT TO ALL RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY NIMH, THESE THEMES HIGHLIGHT AREAS WHERE NIMH-FUNDED SCIENCE MAY HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT, BRIDGE GAPS, AND OFFER NOVEL APPROACHES TO ACCELERATE ADVANCES IN MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH. FOR EXAMPLE, NIMH VALUES A COMPREHENSIVE RESEARCH AGENDA THAT TAKES AN INCLUSIVE APPROACH THAT ENSURES RESEARCH INTERESTS ARE VARIED, MAINTAIN DIVERSE PARTICIPATION AND PARTNERSHIPS, AND ACHIEVE RESEARCH GOALS ACROSS MULTIPLE TIMEFRAMES. THIS INCLUDES DIVERSE METHODOLOGIES, TOOLS, AND MODELS, RESEARCH ADDRESSING COMPLEX BASIC, TRANSLATIONAL, AND APPLIED QUESTIONS, RESEARCH INCLUDING BOTH SEXES AND, AS APPROPRIATE, GENETIC BACKGROUND, AND, PARTICIPANTS FROM DIVERSE RACIAL AND ETHNIC BACKGROUNDS, AND ACROSS GENDER IDENTITIES, GEOGRAPHICAL CONTEXT, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, NEUROTYPE, AND AGE OFFERING THE BEST POSSIBLE REPRESENTATION, FOR THE BROADEST NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO MAY ULTIMATELY BENEFIT FROM THESE SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES. TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOALS OUTLINED IN THE NEW STRATEGIC PLAN, NIMH WILL SUPPORT RESEARCH THAT AIMS: TO CHARACTERIZE THE GENOMIC, MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, AND CIRCUIT COMPONENTS CONTRIBUTING TO BRAIN ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION, TO IDENTIFY THE DEVELOPMENTAL, FUNCTIONAL, AND REGULATORY MECHANISMS RELEVANT TO COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE, AND SOCIAL DOMAINS, ACROSS UNITS OF ANALYSIS, AND, TO GENERATE AND VALIDATE NOVEL TOOLS, TECHNIQUES, AND MEASURES TO QUANTIFY CHANGES IN THE ACTIVITY OF MOLECULES, CELLS, CIRCUITS, AND CONNECTOMES. TO DISCOVER GENE VARIANTS AND OTHER GENOMIC ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESSES IN DIVERSE POPULATIONS, TO ADVANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMPLEX ETIOLOGY OF MENTAL ILLNESSES USING MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGIC APPROACHES THAT INCORPORATE INDIVIDUAL GENETIC INFORMATION IN LARGE COHORTS, TO ELUCIDATE HOW HUMAN GENETIC VARIATION AFFECTS THE COORDINATION OF MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL NETWORKS SUPPORTING HIGHER-ORDER FUNCTIONS AND EMERGENT PROPERTIES OF NEUROBIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, AND, TO DEVELOP NOVEL TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF LARGE-SCALE GENETIC, MULTI-OMIC DATA AS IT APPLIES TO MENTAL HEALTH. TO UTILIZE CONNECTOMIC APPROACHES TO IDENTIFY BRAIN NETWORKS AND CIRCUIT COMPONENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VARIOUS ASPECTS OF MENTAL FUNCTION AND DYSFUNCTION, TO DETERMINE THROUGH BRAIN-WIDE ANALYSIS HOW CHANGES IN THE PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MOLECULES, CELLS, AND CIRCUITS CONTRIBUTE TO MENTAL ILLNESSES, TO DEVELOP MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, AND CIRCUIT-LEVEL BIOMARKERS OF IMPAIRED NEURAL FUNCTION IN HUMANS, AND, TO DEVELOP INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INCLUDING NEW IMAGING, COMPUTATIONAL, PHARMACOLOGICAL, AND GENETIC TOOLS TO INTERROGATE AND MODULATE CIRCUIT ACTIVITY AND STRUCTURE ALTERED IN MENTAL ILLNESSES. TO ELUCIDATE THE MECHANISMS CONTRIBUTING TO THE TRAJECTORIES OF BRAIN DEVELOPMENT AND BEHAVIOR, AND, TO CHARACTERIZE THE EMERGENCE AND PROGRESSION OF MENTAL ILLNESSES, AND IDENTIFYING SENSITIVE PERIODS FOR OPTIMAL INTERVENTION. TO DETERMINE EARLY RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS, AND RELATED MECHANISMS, TO SERVE AS NOVEL INTERVENTION GROUPS, AND, TO DEVELOP RELIABLE AND ROBUST BIOMARKERS AND ASSESSMENT TOOLS TO PREDICT ILLNESS ONSET, COURSE, AND ACROSS DIVERSE POPULATIONS. TO DEVELOP NOVEL INTERVENTIONS USING A MECHANISM-INFORMED, EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS APPROACH, AND, TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES TO FACILITATE MECHANISM-BASED INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING. TO INVESTIGATE PERSONALIZED INTERVENTION STRATEGIES ACROSS DISEASE PROGRESSION AND DEVELOPMENT, AND, TO DEVELOP AND REFINE COMPUTATIONAL APPROACHES AND RESEARCH DESIGNS THAT CAN BE USED TO INFORM AND TEST PERSONALIZED INTERVENTIONS. TO DEVELOP AND TEST APPROACHES FOR ADAPTING, COMBINING, AND SEQUENCING INTERVENTIONS TO ACHIEVE THE GREATEST IMPACT ON THE LIVES AND FUNCTIONING OF PERSONS SEEKING CARE, TO CONDUCT EFFICIENT PRAGMATIC TRIALS THAT EMPLOY NEW TOOLS TO RAPIDLY IDENTIFY, ENGAGE, ASSESS, AND FOLLOW PARTICIPANTS IN THE CONTEXT OF ROUTINE CARE, AND, TO ENHANCE THE PRACTICAL RELEVANCE OF EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH VIA DEPLOYMENT-FOCUSED, HYBRID, EFFECTIVENESS-IMPLEMENTATION STUDIES. TO EMPLOY ASSESSMENT PLATFORMS WITHIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS TO ACCURATELY ASSESS THE DISTRIBUTION AND DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL ILLNESSES AND TO INFORM STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVED SERVICES, TO OPTIMIZE REAL-WORLD DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS TO IDENTIFY STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING ACCESS, QUALITY, EFFECTIVENESS, AND CONTINUITY OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, AND, TO COMPARE ALTERNATIVE FINANCING MODELS TO PROMOTE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES AND SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESSES. TO STRENGTHEN PARTNERSHIPS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTING, SUSTAINING, AND CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES, TO BUILD MODELS TO SCALE-UP EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES FOR USE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PRIMARY CARE, SPECIALTY CARE AND OTHER SETTINGS, AND, TO DEVELOP DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGIES THAT INCREASE THE EFFECTIVENESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH INTERVENTIONS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PRIMARY CARE, SPECIALTY CARE, AND OTHER SETTINGS. TO ADAPT, VALIDATE, AND SCALE-UP PROGRAMS CURRENTLY IN USE THAT IMPROVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS, TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE SERVICE DELIVERY MODELS THAT PROVIDE EVIDENCE-BASED CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF MENTAL ILLNESS, TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE SYSTEMS-LEVEL STRATEGIES USING TECHNOLOGY AND OTHER APPROACHES, TO IDENTIFY, SUPPORT, AND MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EVIDENCE-BASED CARE THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF ILLNESS, AND, TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE DECISION-MAKING MODELS THAT BRIDGE MENTAL HEALTH, MEDICAL, AND OTHER CARE SETTINGS TO INTEGRATE THE APPROPRIATE CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESSES AND COMORBID MEDICAL CONDITIONS.
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
Boston,
Massachusetts
021156028
United States
Geographic Scope
Single Zip Code
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the total obligations have increased 396% from $675,691 to $3,350,173.
President And Fellows Of Harvard College was awarded
County-Level COVID-19 Policies Impacting Mental Health Disparities
Cooperative Agreement U01MH129968
worth $3,350,173
from the National Institute of Mental Health in September 2021 with work to be completed primarily in Boston Massachusetts United States.
The grant
has a duration of 4 years 10 months and
was awarded through assistance program 93.242 Mental Health Research Grants.
The Cooperative Agreement was awarded through grant opportunity Emergency Award: Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research on COVID-19 Consortium (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 9/24/25
Period of Performance
9/17/21
Start Date
7/31/26
End Date
Funding Split
$3.4M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$3.4M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Transaction History
Modifications to U01MH129968
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
U01MH129968
SAI Number
U01MH129968-1533247693
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Private Institution Of Higher Education
Awarding Office
75N700 NIH National Institute of Mental Health
Funding Office
75N700 NIH National Institute of Mental Health
Awardee UEI
UNVDZNFA8R29
Awardee CAGE
3KFQ9
Performance District
MA-07
Senators
Edward Markey
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0892) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $1,203,246 | 100% |
Modified: 9/24/25