R01HS028321
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
Responses of the Program of All-Inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE) organizations to COVID-19 challenges: Effects and lessons learned - Project summary/abstract.
PACE (the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly) is a well-known and respected financing and care delivery model for a very challenging population: Medicaid-covered adults over age 55 needing a nursing home level of care, 90% of whom are also covered by Medicare.
PACE participants are generally dependent in at least 2 activities of daily living (ADLs) or need constant supervision due to cognitive disability. To be eligible for PACE enrollment, participants must be able to live safely in the community with PACE services.
The heart of the PACE model lies in its comprehensive service array, starting with a participant-centered care plan constructed in partnership with a multidisciplinary care team and anchored in a PACE day center that regularly offers medical care, personal care, therapies, meals, socialization, transportation, and activities.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, PACE programs have used their flexibility as a community-based provider of medical and long-term services and supports (LTSS) to redesign service delivery and keep frail elders as safe as possible in the community.
Preliminary reports to the National PACE Association (NPA) indicate that most programs quickly expanded telehealth and moved many services to the home. Anecdotal accounts indicate that some programs have implemented remarkable adaptations: e.g., providing overnight care (not typically allowed in PACE), renting hotel rooms for infected participants, making part of the PACE center an isolation area, redefining staff roles and providing training in those new roles, and providing post-hospital therapies in the PACE center to avoid sending frail elders to post-acute stays in nursing homes, which have had high rates of COVID-19 infection.
However, to this point, researchers have not systematically investigated, compiled, and evaluated the responses of PACE programs. Our project will provide authoritative information for each of three six-month phases of the COVID-19 experience, identify emerging best practices, and compare PACE performance to traditional Medicare services, adding to the knowledge base of innovative responses used during the COVID-19 pandemic to guide ongoing policy and practice.
We will build on an existing NPA database, supplementing it with an online survey of PACE programs. We will identify responses that PACE programs report as being substantially beneficial, and those that have not been effective, for the following: PACE participants, their families, the availability and quality of eldercare services in the geographic community, the healthcare workforce, and PACE program finances.
We will compare the utilization and quality outcomes of PACE participants and comparable Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. We will dig deeper into promising adaptations through structured interviews. We will estimate the potential effects of broad spread of better practices, and we will continuously feed our insights into the research, clinical practice, and policy worlds to engender improvements in eldercare arrangements.
PACE (the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly) is a well-known and respected financing and care delivery model for a very challenging population: Medicaid-covered adults over age 55 needing a nursing home level of care, 90% of whom are also covered by Medicare.
PACE participants are generally dependent in at least 2 activities of daily living (ADLs) or need constant supervision due to cognitive disability. To be eligible for PACE enrollment, participants must be able to live safely in the community with PACE services.
The heart of the PACE model lies in its comprehensive service array, starting with a participant-centered care plan constructed in partnership with a multidisciplinary care team and anchored in a PACE day center that regularly offers medical care, personal care, therapies, meals, socialization, transportation, and activities.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, PACE programs have used their flexibility as a community-based provider of medical and long-term services and supports (LTSS) to redesign service delivery and keep frail elders as safe as possible in the community.
Preliminary reports to the National PACE Association (NPA) indicate that most programs quickly expanded telehealth and moved many services to the home. Anecdotal accounts indicate that some programs have implemented remarkable adaptations: e.g., providing overnight care (not typically allowed in PACE), renting hotel rooms for infected participants, making part of the PACE center an isolation area, redefining staff roles and providing training in those new roles, and providing post-hospital therapies in the PACE center to avoid sending frail elders to post-acute stays in nursing homes, which have had high rates of COVID-19 infection.
However, to this point, researchers have not systematically investigated, compiled, and evaluated the responses of PACE programs. Our project will provide authoritative information for each of three six-month phases of the COVID-19 experience, identify emerging best practices, and compare PACE performance to traditional Medicare services, adding to the knowledge base of innovative responses used during the COVID-19 pandemic to guide ongoing policy and practice.
We will build on an existing NPA database, supplementing it with an online survey of PACE programs. We will identify responses that PACE programs report as being substantially beneficial, and those that have not been effective, for the following: PACE participants, their families, the availability and quality of eldercare services in the geographic community, the healthcare workforce, and PACE program finances.
We will compare the utilization and quality outcomes of PACE participants and comparable Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. We will dig deeper into promising adaptations through structured interviews. We will estimate the potential effects of broad spread of better practices, and we will continuously feed our insights into the research, clinical practice, and policy worlds to engender improvements in eldercare arrangements.
Awardee
Funding Goals
NOT APPLICABLE
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding Agency
Place of Performance
Ann Arbor,
Michigan
481051566
United States
Geographic Scope
Single Zip Code
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the End Date has been extended from 12/31/22 to 12/31/23 and the total obligations have increased 98% from $490,136 to $968,117.
Altarum Institute was awarded
Project Grant R01HS028321
worth $968,117
from Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement in January 2020 with work to be completed primarily in Ann Arbor Michigan United States.
The grant
has a duration of 3 years and
was awarded through assistance program 93.226 Research on Healthcare Costs, Quality and Outcomes.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity Novel, High-Impact Studies Evaluating Health System and Healthcare Professional Responsiveness to COVID-19 (R01).
Status
(Complete)
Last Modified 3/5/24
Period of Performance
1/1/21
Start Date
12/31/23
End Date
Funding Split
$968.1K
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$968.1K
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Transaction History
Modifications to R01HS028321
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01HS028321
SAI Number
R01HS028321-1172715981
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Nonprofit With 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other Than An Institution Of Higher Education)
Awarding Office
75AHRQ AHRQ OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES/DIVISION OF GRANTS MANAGEMENT
Funding Office
75EK00 AHRQ CENTER FOR EVIDENCE AND PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT
Awardee UEI
W87EWFMEBBD1
Awardee CAGE
57949
Performance District
MI-06
Senators
Debbie Stabenow
Gary Peters
Gary Peters
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Healthcare Research and Quality, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Health and Human Services (075-1700) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $477,981 | 100% |
Modified: 3/5/24