R01HG011711
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
Polygenic Embryo Screening: Towards Informed Decision-Making - Project Summary
Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has been utilized for years to avoid implantation of embryos harboring rare monogenic disease-causing alleles or aneuploidies. However, recent progress in complex trait genetics, coupled with the technical ability to generate accurate genome-wide genotypes from single-cell input, has made it possible to genetically screen embryos for common polygenic traits and disease risk.
While popular media has raised the specter of ‘‘designer babies,’’ and private industry has begun to offer services of dubious merit, little empirical work has been done to quantify the utility of Polygenic Embryo Screening (PES), examine its ethical implications, and assess stakeholders’ perspectives. Unlike conventional PGT, polygenic risk scores are inherently probabilistic and multifaceted. The inherent ambiguities of PES require careful consideration in order for clinicians, policymakers, and the general public to make informed decisions about the potential consequences of implementing polygenic embryo screening.
Moreover, although research momentum for polygenic risk scores has grown exponentially in the last few years, there is almost no independent, empirical data on either: 1) the potential ability of PES to produce desired outcomes under various real-world scenarios; or 2) the perspectives and attitudes of front-line clinicians in the potential clinical application of polygenic risk scores, especially in the prenatal context.
In order to build an initial framework for the consideration of the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of PES, it is necessary to establish two sets of empirical parameters: first, the statistical properties that will shape the potential application of polygenic risk scores in the prenatal setting; and second, the attitudes and perspectives of clinicians who would be at the front lines of administering PES, including genetic counselors, reproductive endocrinologists, and obstetricians.
The proposed study therefore aims to quantify the range of realistic outcomes of PES in the context of disease risk reduction under varying conditions, using a combination of simulated and real data. We also aim to understand the perspectives of clinicians who would potentially deliver PES, using both in-depth interviews and a large-scale survey of reproductive clinicians and geneticists.
In the proposed research project, these two aims will be interdigitated and mutually informative; statistical investigation will be guided by concerns and questions posed by stakeholders, and stakeholder interviews and surveys will be shaped by the statistical and methodological understanding obtained from our analyses. On the basis of our results, we will perform ethical analysis of this rapidly evolving technology.
Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has been utilized for years to avoid implantation of embryos harboring rare monogenic disease-causing alleles or aneuploidies. However, recent progress in complex trait genetics, coupled with the technical ability to generate accurate genome-wide genotypes from single-cell input, has made it possible to genetically screen embryos for common polygenic traits and disease risk.
While popular media has raised the specter of ‘‘designer babies,’’ and private industry has begun to offer services of dubious merit, little empirical work has been done to quantify the utility of Polygenic Embryo Screening (PES), examine its ethical implications, and assess stakeholders’ perspectives. Unlike conventional PGT, polygenic risk scores are inherently probabilistic and multifaceted. The inherent ambiguities of PES require careful consideration in order for clinicians, policymakers, and the general public to make informed decisions about the potential consequences of implementing polygenic embryo screening.
Moreover, although research momentum for polygenic risk scores has grown exponentially in the last few years, there is almost no independent, empirical data on either: 1) the potential ability of PES to produce desired outcomes under various real-world scenarios; or 2) the perspectives and attitudes of front-line clinicians in the potential clinical application of polygenic risk scores, especially in the prenatal context.
In order to build an initial framework for the consideration of the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of PES, it is necessary to establish two sets of empirical parameters: first, the statistical properties that will shape the potential application of polygenic risk scores in the prenatal setting; and second, the attitudes and perspectives of clinicians who would be at the front lines of administering PES, including genetic counselors, reproductive endocrinologists, and obstetricians.
The proposed study therefore aims to quantify the range of realistic outcomes of PES in the context of disease risk reduction under varying conditions, using a combination of simulated and real data. We also aim to understand the perspectives of clinicians who would potentially deliver PES, using both in-depth interviews and a large-scale survey of reproductive clinicians and geneticists.
In the proposed research project, these two aims will be interdigitated and mutually informative; statistical investigation will be guided by concerns and questions posed by stakeholders, and stakeholder interviews and surveys will be shaped by the statistical and methodological understanding obtained from our analyses. On the basis of our results, we will perform ethical analysis of this rapidly evolving technology.
Funding Goals
NHGRI SUPPORTS THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGIES THAT WILL ACCELERATE GENOME RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATION TO HUMAN HEALTH AND GENOMIC MEDICINE. A CRITICAL PART OF THE NHGRI MISSION CONTINUES TO BE THE STUDY OF THE ETHICAL, LEGAL AND SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS (ELSI) OF GENOME RESEARCH. NHGRI ALSO SUPPORTS THE TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT OF INVESTIGATORS AND THE DISSEMINATION OF GENOME INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC AND TO HEALTH PROFESSIONALS. THE SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM IS USED TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, TO INCREASE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION. THE SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAM IS USED TO FOSTER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CARRIED OUT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO FOSTER TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION.
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
New York
United States
Geographic Scope
State-Wide
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the End Date has been extended from 03/31/25 to 08/31/29 and the total obligations have increased 723% from $749,395 to $6,167,179.
The Feinstein Institutes For Medical Research was awarded
Polygenic Embryo Screening: Empirical Study on Utility Ethical Implications
Project Grant R01HG011711
worth $6,167,179
from National Human Genome Research Institute in June 2021 with work to be completed primarily in New York United States.
The grant
has a duration of 8 years 2 months and
was awarded through assistance program 93.172 Human Genome Research.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) Research (R01 Clinical Trial Optional).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 9/24/25
Period of Performance
6/1/21
Start Date
8/31/29
End Date
Funding Split
$6.2M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$6.2M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Transaction History
Modifications to R01HG011711
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01HG011711
SAI Number
R01HG011711-2193554422
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Nonprofit With 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other Than An Institution Of Higher Education)
Awarding Office
75N400 NIH National Human Genome Research Institute
Funding Office
75N400 NIH National Human Genome Research Institute
Awardee UEI
C5LHMPRJ9J19
Awardee CAGE
3D9G5
Performance District
NY-90
Senators
Kirsten Gillibrand
Charles Schumer
Charles Schumer
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0891) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $1,445,926 | 100% |
Modified: 9/24/25