R01CA262719
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
Ethnicity and Lung Cancer Survival: A Test of the Hispanic Sociocultural Hypothesis - Project Summary/Abstract
As the leading cause of cancer death, lung cancer represents the most significant cancer-related public health challenge in the United States. Although low-dose CT-based screening holds promise for earlier detection, currently, most lung cancer cases are not diagnosed until advanced stages (III, IV) and have 5-year survival rates of 21% or less.
In contrast to black-white survival disparities, Hispanic patients have markedly lower age-adjusted death rates than their non-Hispanic white (NHW) counterparts despite later stage diagnoses and broader SES and healthcare disparities; these findings are well established and consistent with the "Hispanic health paradox," a phenomenon characterized by Hispanic advantages in objective health outcomes (e.g., mortality) despite significant health and socioeconomic risk factors.
The leading explanatory hypothesis concerns the role of cultural factors facilitating social integration. Social integration is among the most robust psychosocial predictors of a range of objective health outcomes, including cancer survival. However, no published work has directly tested this sociocultural hypothesis in relation to Hispanic resilience.
Consistent with the emerging science of resilience, we propose a multisite, two-study, mixed-methods investigation to evaluate this sociocultural hypothesis.
Study 1 is a multisite, longitudinal observational study of 672 Hispanic and NHW individuals with advanced stage lung cancer sampled from three regions across the U.S. Interviews using gold-standard and culturally-informed survey measures (demographics, social integration, cultural values, acculturation) will be conducted in English and Spanish from a centralized coordinating center with a 6-week follow-up to examine change in perceived support provision/needs. The primary outcome of survival and secondary outcomes (e.g., treatment adherence) will be gathered from electronic medical records over a mean follow-up time of 33 months.
Study 2 is a single-site, 7-day, intensive measurement investigation into the daily units of social integration that mediate outcomes. Study 2 integrates two novel in vivo sampling methods (electronically activated recorder [EAR] and ecological momentary assessments [EMA]) using a mobile phone platform.
The current aims are to (1) investigate whether the observed Hispanic survival advantage is mediated by ethnic differences in social integration among recently diagnosed late-stage lung cancer patients and (2) to examine the processes/mechanisms that underlie these relationships in daily life, including the role of individual, family, network, and neighborhood-level factors.
The highly experienced investigator team includes leaders in all relevant content areas, including the Hispanic health paradox, lung cancer survivorship, social integration, and ecological sampling methodologies. The results will contribute to a better understanding of social processes among cancer patients, inform psychosocial interventions based on social integration, and contribute to the emerging science of health resilience as well as racial/ethnic and cultural variations in health outcomes.
As the leading cause of cancer death, lung cancer represents the most significant cancer-related public health challenge in the United States. Although low-dose CT-based screening holds promise for earlier detection, currently, most lung cancer cases are not diagnosed until advanced stages (III, IV) and have 5-year survival rates of 21% or less.
In contrast to black-white survival disparities, Hispanic patients have markedly lower age-adjusted death rates than their non-Hispanic white (NHW) counterparts despite later stage diagnoses and broader SES and healthcare disparities; these findings are well established and consistent with the "Hispanic health paradox," a phenomenon characterized by Hispanic advantages in objective health outcomes (e.g., mortality) despite significant health and socioeconomic risk factors.
The leading explanatory hypothesis concerns the role of cultural factors facilitating social integration. Social integration is among the most robust psychosocial predictors of a range of objective health outcomes, including cancer survival. However, no published work has directly tested this sociocultural hypothesis in relation to Hispanic resilience.
Consistent with the emerging science of resilience, we propose a multisite, two-study, mixed-methods investigation to evaluate this sociocultural hypothesis.
Study 1 is a multisite, longitudinal observational study of 672 Hispanic and NHW individuals with advanced stage lung cancer sampled from three regions across the U.S. Interviews using gold-standard and culturally-informed survey measures (demographics, social integration, cultural values, acculturation) will be conducted in English and Spanish from a centralized coordinating center with a 6-week follow-up to examine change in perceived support provision/needs. The primary outcome of survival and secondary outcomes (e.g., treatment adherence) will be gathered from electronic medical records over a mean follow-up time of 33 months.
Study 2 is a single-site, 7-day, intensive measurement investigation into the daily units of social integration that mediate outcomes. Study 2 integrates two novel in vivo sampling methods (electronically activated recorder [EAR] and ecological momentary assessments [EMA]) using a mobile phone platform.
The current aims are to (1) investigate whether the observed Hispanic survival advantage is mediated by ethnic differences in social integration among recently diagnosed late-stage lung cancer patients and (2) to examine the processes/mechanisms that underlie these relationships in daily life, including the role of individual, family, network, and neighborhood-level factors.
The highly experienced investigator team includes leaders in all relevant content areas, including the Hispanic health paradox, lung cancer survivorship, social integration, and ecological sampling methodologies. The results will contribute to a better understanding of social processes among cancer patients, inform psychosocial interventions based on social integration, and contribute to the emerging science of health resilience as well as racial/ethnic and cultural variations in health outcomes.
Awardee
Funding Goals
TO IDENTIFY CANCER RISKS AND RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES, TO IDENTIFY FACTORS THAT CAUSE CANCER IN HUMANS, AND TO DISCOVER AND DEVELOP MECHANISMS FOR CANCER PREVENTION AND PREVENTIVE INTERVENTIONS IN HUMANS. RESEARCH PROGRAMS INCLUDE: (1) CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL AND MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS, (2) SCREENING, EARLY DETECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, INCLUDING BIOMARKER DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION, (3) EPIDEMIOLOGY, (4) NUTRITION AND BIOACTIVE FOOD COMPONENTS, (5) IMMUNOLOGY AND VACCINES, (6) FIELD STUDIES AND STATISTICS, (7) CANCER CHEMOPREVENTION AND INTERCEPTION, (8) PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL AGENT DEVELOPMENT, (9) ORGAN SITE STUDIES AND CLINICAL TRIALS, (10) HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AND PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES, AND (11) SUPPORTIVE CARE AND MANAGEMENT OF SYMPTOMS AND TOXICITIES. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM: TO EXPAND AND IMPROVE THE SBIR PROGRAM, TO STIMULATE TECHNICAL INNOVATION, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, TO INCREASE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP BY WOMEN AND SOCIALLY/ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED PERSONS. SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAM: TO STIMULATE AND FOSTER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CARRIED OUT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO FOSTER TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, AND FOSTER PARTICIPATION IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP BY WOMEN AND SOCIALLY/ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED PERSONS.
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
Tucson,
Arizona
857210001
United States
Geographic Scope
Single Zip Code
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the total obligations have increased 344% from $741,873 to $3,292,953.
University Of Arizona was awarded
Hispanic Lung Cancer Survival: Sociocultural Hypothesis Test
Project Grant R01CA262719
worth $3,292,953
from National Cancer Institute in July 2021 with work to be completed primarily in Tucson Arizona United States.
The grant
has a duration of 5 years and
was awarded through assistance program 93.393 Cancer Cause and Prevention Research.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity NIH Research Project Grant (Parent R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 7/21/25
Period of Performance
7/1/21
Start Date
6/30/26
End Date
Funding Split
$3.3M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$3.3M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Subgrant Awards
Disclosed subgrants for R01CA262719
Transaction History
Modifications to R01CA262719
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01CA262719
SAI Number
R01CA262719-1395733160
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Public/State Controlled Institution Of Higher Education
Awarding Office
75NC00 NIH National Cancer Institute
Funding Office
75NC00 NIH National Cancer Institute
Awardee UEI
ED44Y3W6P7B9
Awardee CAGE
0LJH3
Performance District
AZ-07
Senators
Kyrsten Sinema
Mark Kelly
Mark Kelly
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0849) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $1,288,061 | 100% |
Modified: 7/21/25