R01CA255872
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Multilevel Implementation Strategies to Improve Provider Recommendation and Advance HPV Vaccination: A Cluster Randomized Trial - Project Abstract
Millions of US teens remain at risk of developing human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers due to inadequate HPV vaccine uptake, despite strong endorsement in clinical guidelines and substantial prior intervention efforts. A 2018 national survey showed that HPV vaccine complete series coverage for teens age 13-15 years was only 50%, far below the 80% target of Healthy People 2020. Prior research has identified strong provider recommendation as the most powerful facilitator of HPV vaccine uptake. Yet, little is known about how to leverage this and other facilitators.
Additionally, studies have also revealed multilevel, multifactorial barriers to improving HPV vaccination including negative parental perceptions and limitations of health system support. Furthermore, evidence suggests that HPV vaccine barriers can vary across demographic subgroups, communities, and clinics. Despite this knowledge, many prior intervention studies focus on single-level, single component interventions, leaving many barriers unaddressed. Of studies that are multilevel and/or multi-component, interventions are often pre-selected to address "typical" barriers but are not responsive to unique local barriers and local context.
To address this critical gap, we propose a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare implementation strategies that are multilevel and multicomponent and guided by in-depth understanding of how multilevel factors in the practice settings modify the impact of key facilitators such as provider recommendation. We will use mixed methods (surveys, interviews, electronic health records) throughout; initially, we will evaluate baseline associations between patient-, provider-, and clinic-level factors and variations in HPV vaccination rates and the quality of the provider recommendation (Aim 1).
In Aim 2, we will compare the effectiveness of: 1) a novel "local-tailored" implementation strategy, co-designed with local care teams to address local barriers and contexts; versus 2) a "prescribed" strategy, typical of most health systems, that involves pre-specified interventions addressing pre-selected vaccination barriers; versus 3) usual care. We will evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies on improving HPV vaccination (primary outcome) and strengthening provider recommendation (secondary outcome) as well as analyzing cost-effectiveness. We will also study mechanisms of effect of the implementation strategies (Aim 3).
Although the need for local tailoring seems intuitive, it is unknown if local tailoring will yield superior outcomes that could offset the extra investment required, supporting the need for this RCT. We will conduct the study within Kaiser Permanente Southern California, one of the largest community-based pediatric care organizations in the US. Our study will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Multilevel Factors Across the Cancer Care Continuum Framework.
Completion of these aims will generate important insights into the multilevel factors associated with provider recommendation and HPV vaccine uptake. This study has high potential to generate guidance for diverse healthcare settings to improve HPV vaccination.
Millions of US teens remain at risk of developing human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers due to inadequate HPV vaccine uptake, despite strong endorsement in clinical guidelines and substantial prior intervention efforts. A 2018 national survey showed that HPV vaccine complete series coverage for teens age 13-15 years was only 50%, far below the 80% target of Healthy People 2020. Prior research has identified strong provider recommendation as the most powerful facilitator of HPV vaccine uptake. Yet, little is known about how to leverage this and other facilitators.
Additionally, studies have also revealed multilevel, multifactorial barriers to improving HPV vaccination including negative parental perceptions and limitations of health system support. Furthermore, evidence suggests that HPV vaccine barriers can vary across demographic subgroups, communities, and clinics. Despite this knowledge, many prior intervention studies focus on single-level, single component interventions, leaving many barriers unaddressed. Of studies that are multilevel and/or multi-component, interventions are often pre-selected to address "typical" barriers but are not responsive to unique local barriers and local context.
To address this critical gap, we propose a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare implementation strategies that are multilevel and multicomponent and guided by in-depth understanding of how multilevel factors in the practice settings modify the impact of key facilitators such as provider recommendation. We will use mixed methods (surveys, interviews, electronic health records) throughout; initially, we will evaluate baseline associations between patient-, provider-, and clinic-level factors and variations in HPV vaccination rates and the quality of the provider recommendation (Aim 1).
In Aim 2, we will compare the effectiveness of: 1) a novel "local-tailored" implementation strategy, co-designed with local care teams to address local barriers and contexts; versus 2) a "prescribed" strategy, typical of most health systems, that involves pre-specified interventions addressing pre-selected vaccination barriers; versus 3) usual care. We will evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies on improving HPV vaccination (primary outcome) and strengthening provider recommendation (secondary outcome) as well as analyzing cost-effectiveness. We will also study mechanisms of effect of the implementation strategies (Aim 3).
Although the need for local tailoring seems intuitive, it is unknown if local tailoring will yield superior outcomes that could offset the extra investment required, supporting the need for this RCT. We will conduct the study within Kaiser Permanente Southern California, one of the largest community-based pediatric care organizations in the US. Our study will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Multilevel Factors Across the Cancer Care Continuum Framework.
Completion of these aims will generate important insights into the multilevel factors associated with provider recommendation and HPV vaccine uptake. This study has high potential to generate guidance for diverse healthcare settings to improve HPV vaccination.
Awardee
Funding Goals
TO IDENTIFY CANCER RISKS AND RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES, TO IDENTIFY FACTORS THAT CAUSE CANCER IN HUMANS, AND TO DISCOVER AND DEVELOP MECHANISMS FOR CANCER PREVENTION AND PREVENTIVE INTERVENTIONS IN HUMANS. RESEARCH PROGRAMS INCLUDE: (1) CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL AND MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS, (2) SCREENING, EARLY DETECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, INCLUDING BIOMARKER DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION, (3) EPIDEMIOLOGY, (4) NUTRITION AND BIOACTIVE FOOD COMPONENTS, (5) IMMUNOLOGY AND VACCINES, (6) FIELD STUDIES AND STATISTICS, (7) CANCER CHEMOPREVENTION AND INTERCEPTION, (8) PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL AGENT DEVELOPMENT, (9) ORGAN SITE STUDIES AND CLINICAL TRIALS, (10) HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AND PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES, AND (11) SUPPORTIVE CARE AND MANAGEMENT OF SYMPTOMS AND TOXICITIES. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM: TO EXPAND AND IMPROVE THE SBIR PROGRAM, TO STIMULATE TECHNICAL INNOVATION, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, TO INCREASE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP BY WOMEN AND SOCIALLY/ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED PERSONS. SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAM: TO STIMULATE AND FOSTER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CARRIED OUT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO FOSTER TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, AND FOSTER PARTICIPATION IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP BY WOMEN AND SOCIALLY/ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED PERSONS.
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
Pasadena,
California
911012453
United States
Geographic Scope
Single Zip Code
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the total obligations have increased 359% from $691,976 to $3,174,560.
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals was awarded
Multilevel Implementation Strategies Improved HPV Vaccination: A Cluster RCT
Project Grant R01CA255872
worth $3,174,560
from National Cancer Institute in July 2021 with work to be completed primarily in Pasadena California United States.
The grant
has a duration of 5 years and
was awarded through assistance program 93.393 Cancer Cause and Prevention Research.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity Linking the Provider Recommendation to Adolescent HPV Vaccine Uptake (R01 Clinical Trial Optional).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 9/5/25
Period of Performance
7/15/21
Start Date
6/30/26
End Date
Funding Split
$3.2M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$3.2M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Subgrant Awards
Disclosed subgrants for R01CA255872
Transaction History
Modifications to R01CA255872
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01CA255872
SAI Number
R01CA255872-1378364365
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Nonprofit With 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other Than An Institution Of Higher Education)
Awarding Office
75NC00 NIH National Cancer Institute
Funding Office
75NC00 NIH National Cancer Institute
Awardee UEI
P1RTMASB37B5
Awardee CAGE
0ZUC3
Performance District
CA-28
Senators
Dianne Feinstein
Alejandro Padilla
Alejandro Padilla
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0849) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $1,276,893 | 100% |
Modified: 9/5/25