R01AT011257
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
Project Summary/Abstract
Elucidating Neural Mechanisms and Sex Differences in Response to Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has demonstrated efficacy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), yet there remains a major knowledge gap about its neural mechanisms. Neuroimaging studies thus far have mostly focused on the impact of MBSR on structural and resting-state brain changes, and these studies have been predominantly conducted in healthy participants.
Core features of GAD, such as rumination worry, represent dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies that increase bias towards future threat. MBSR success is associated with improved emotion regulation, enhanced attention to the present moment, and non-judgmental acceptance of internal and external cues.
Our primary aim is to elucidate neural mechanisms that drive response to MBSR in patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and to examine the degree to which sex differences in MBSR response are explained by sex differences in these mechanisms. Our overarching hypothesis is that MBSR enhances 'top-down' learning and memory capacities that are broad and impact 'top-down' as well as 'instinctual' abilities (bottom-up) to regulate fear and emotions.
We will first study the functional activation of brain regions associated with the fear extinction network (ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), hippocampus, and amygdala) as a specific probe of the 'instinctual' type of emotion regulation. Second, we will use a novel analytic approach to examine large-scale functional connectivity as a marker of neural plasticity changes (pre- and post-MBSR) trial-by-trial during fear extinction learning across the entire brain, focusing analyses on the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (FPN), and ventral attention network (VAN).
Next, we will examine sex differences in MBSR-induced neural changes and their relationship to sex differences in clinical GAD response. Finally, we will use a novel statistical approach to explore whether baseline neural measures can predict MBSR-induced neural changes and clinical symptom reduction to identify likely MBSR responders.
Participants will undergo a standardized 2-day fear conditioning and extinction paradigm in the fMRI scanner before and after MBSR or stress education (SE) with primary clinical outcomes at endpoint and 3-month follow-up.
This study's objectives are aligned with NCCIH's PA-18-323: Fundamental Science Research on Mind and Body Approaches by studying MBSR's neural mechanism of action and sex differences in patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), a prevalent condition often seen in primary care for whom MBSR efficacy is established.
This study will deploy rigorous scientific methods with a time and attention control intervention to enable isolation of MBSR's mechanistic impact on brain regions involved in emotion regulation and clinical response. The unique combination of a focus on a classic anxiety condition with established emotion regulation difficulties implicating target neural circuits, previously demonstrated MBSR efficacy, and sex differences with rigorous fMRI behavioral probes with novel analytic approaches ought to provide major new insights about MBSR mechanisms and sex considerations, moving towards precision medicine that could guide future treatment development research.
Elucidating Neural Mechanisms and Sex Differences in Response to Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has demonstrated efficacy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), yet there remains a major knowledge gap about its neural mechanisms. Neuroimaging studies thus far have mostly focused on the impact of MBSR on structural and resting-state brain changes, and these studies have been predominantly conducted in healthy participants.
Core features of GAD, such as rumination worry, represent dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies that increase bias towards future threat. MBSR success is associated with improved emotion regulation, enhanced attention to the present moment, and non-judgmental acceptance of internal and external cues.
Our primary aim is to elucidate neural mechanisms that drive response to MBSR in patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and to examine the degree to which sex differences in MBSR response are explained by sex differences in these mechanisms. Our overarching hypothesis is that MBSR enhances 'top-down' learning and memory capacities that are broad and impact 'top-down' as well as 'instinctual' abilities (bottom-up) to regulate fear and emotions.
We will first study the functional activation of brain regions associated with the fear extinction network (ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), hippocampus, and amygdala) as a specific probe of the 'instinctual' type of emotion regulation. Second, we will use a novel analytic approach to examine large-scale functional connectivity as a marker of neural plasticity changes (pre- and post-MBSR) trial-by-trial during fear extinction learning across the entire brain, focusing analyses on the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (FPN), and ventral attention network (VAN).
Next, we will examine sex differences in MBSR-induced neural changes and their relationship to sex differences in clinical GAD response. Finally, we will use a novel statistical approach to explore whether baseline neural measures can predict MBSR-induced neural changes and clinical symptom reduction to identify likely MBSR responders.
Participants will undergo a standardized 2-day fear conditioning and extinction paradigm in the fMRI scanner before and after MBSR or stress education (SE) with primary clinical outcomes at endpoint and 3-month follow-up.
This study's objectives are aligned with NCCIH's PA-18-323: Fundamental Science Research on Mind and Body Approaches by studying MBSR's neural mechanism of action and sex differences in patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), a prevalent condition often seen in primary care for whom MBSR efficacy is established.
This study will deploy rigorous scientific methods with a time and attention control intervention to enable isolation of MBSR's mechanistic impact on brain regions involved in emotion regulation and clinical response. The unique combination of a focus on a classic anxiety condition with established emotion regulation difficulties implicating target neural circuits, previously demonstrated MBSR efficacy, and sex differences with rigorous fMRI behavioral probes with novel analytic approaches ought to provide major new insights about MBSR mechanisms and sex considerations, moving towards precision medicine that could guide future treatment development research.
Awardee
Funding Goals
TO EVALUATE COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH APPROACHES. THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES SUPPORT THIS GOAL: (1) COORDINATE AND FACILITATE THE INVESTIGATION OF COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH APPROACHES THROUGH PEER-REVIEWED GRANT SOLICITATIONS, (2) INTERFACE WITH THE NCCIH NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL, (3) CONDUCT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT CONFERENCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING AREAS OF CLINICAL AND PRE-CLINICAL RESEARCH THAT NEED TO BE FURTHER DEVELOPED WITHIN COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES, AND (4) MAINTAIN A COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA BASE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE. THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH (NCCIH) REGULARLY EXAMINES AND REDEFINES ITS RESEARCH PRIORITIES. IN SETTING RESEARCH PRIORITIES, NCCIH CONSIDERS ITS EXISTING RESEARCH PORTFOLIO, ITS 5-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN, THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH, CURRENT SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES, THE PLANS OF OTHER NIH INSTITUTES AND CENTERS, AND INPUT FROM EXPERT PANELS AND STAKEHOLDERS. RESEARCH CONSTITUTING A RIGOROUS EVIDENCE BASE FOR COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES WILL BE DEVELOPED THROUGH A RANGE OF RESEARCH STRATEGIES INCLUDING BASIC AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION. PRIORITY SETTING ALSO TAKES INTO ACCOUNT: 1)SCIENTIFIC PROMISE, 2)AMENABILITY TO RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY,3) POTENTIAL TO CHANGE HEALTH PRACTICES, AND 4) RELATIONSHIP TO USE AND PRACTICE. RESEARCH APPROACHES BASIC, TRANSLATIONAL, EFFICACY/EFFECTIVENESS, AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH APPROACHES NEED TO BE STUDIED ACROSS THE RESEARCH CONTINUUM. NCCIH CONTINUES TO EMPHASIZE BASIC RESEARCH THAT DEFINES BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND MECHANISMS OF ACTION, THIS RESEARCH IS AIMED AT UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES SUCH AS THEIR BIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES. NCCIH ALSO SUPPORTS THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS, MODELS, AND METHODOLOGIES FOR STUDYING THESE APPROACHES. NCCIH CONTINUES TO ENCOURAGE EFFICACY STUDIES TO DETERMINE SPECIFIC CLINICAL EFFECTS OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES UNDER CAREFULLY CONTROLLED CONDITIONS THAT MINIMIZE NONSPECIFIC AND CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS. THERE IS ALSO THE NEED TO STRENGTHEN TRANSLATIONAL AND PRELIMINARY CLINICAL RESEARCH REQUIRED TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT DEFINITIVE CLINICAL RESEARCH AND ""REAL WORLD"" OUTCOMES AND EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH THAT CAPITALIZES ON THE REALITY THAT MANY COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES ARE IN WIDESPREAD PUBLIC USE. NCCIH'S SUPPORT OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ADDRESSES THE NEED FOR VALID, RELIABLE AND RELEVANT RESEARCH TOOLS, OUTCOME MEASURES, AND INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY TO ENHANCE THE RIGOR OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES WITHIN CLINICAL STUDIES AND TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE MAXIMALLY INFORMATIVE. NCCIH EMPHASIZES STUDIES THAT INFORM THE DESIGN OF FUTURE TRIALS SUCH AS THOSE THAT WILL: DEVELOP AND VALIDATE OUTCOME MEASURES, STANDARDIZE TREATMENT PROTOCOLS OR ALGORITHMS, VALIDATE TREATMENT ALGORITHMS AND/OR, DEVELOP MEASURES OF QUALITY CONTROL OR TREATMENT FIDELITY, ASSESS EFFECTS OF VARIOUS DOSES OR INTERVENTION DURATIONS, DEVELOP PRELIMINARY CLINICAL EVIDENCE REGARDING EFFICACY AND SAFETY TO SUPPORT ESTIMATES OF SAMPLE SIZE, OR ESTABLISH FEASIBILITY OF INTERVENTIONS OR STUDY DESIGNS IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES. NCCIH'S CLINICAL RESEARCH PORTFOLIO UTILIZES CLINICAL TRIAL, CASE-CONTROL, OBSERVATIONAL, COHORT, QUALITATIVE, AND OTHER EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGIES TO DETERMINE SAFETY AND ESTIMATE THE EFFICACY OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES. THE CLINICAL RESEARCH PORTFOLIO INCLUDES EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES OF THE CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVED HEALTH AND WELLNESS MADE BY COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES AS THEY ARE PRACTICED IN ""REAL-WORLD"" SETTINGS. IN GENERAL, PHASE III CLINICAL TRIALS WILL BE SUPPORTED UNDER THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT MECHANISM AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION BY NCCIH STAFF. INVESTIGATORS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING PHASE III STUDIES ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT A RELEVANT NCCIH PROGRAM OFFICER (HTTPS://NCCIH.NIH.GOV/TOOLS/EMAILPROGRAMOFFICERS). AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY IS ESSENTIAL TO THE PROGRESS OF BIOMEDICINE BY ENHANCING THE UNDERSTANDING OF HOW LIVING SYSTEMS WORK. THIS UNDERSTANDING SERVES AS A FOUNDATION FOR TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL STUDIES THAT CAN LEAD TO IMPROVED APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT, TREATMENT, AND PREVENTION OF DISEASES AND SYMPTOMS. ONE KEY GOAL IS TO ADVANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF BASIC BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF NATURAL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING PREBIOTICS AND PROBIOTICS. NCCIH WILL CONTINUE TO SPONSOR RESEARCH ON COMPOUNDS ISOLATED FROM NATURAL PRODUCTS AS WELL AS COMPLEX MIXTURES FROM WHICH THEY ORIGINATE. ADDITIONALLY, NCCIH WILL CONTINUE TO SUPPORT RESEARCH TO ELUCIDATE THE EFFECTS OF PREBIOTICS AND PROBIOTICS ON THE MICROBIOTA NATURALLY PRESENT IN THE HUMAN BODY. ANOTHER KEY GOAL IS TO ADVANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE MECHANISMS OF ACTION BY WHICH MIND AND BODY APPROACHES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: MEDITATION, SPINAL MANIPULATION, MASSAGE, YOGA, TAI CHI, HYPNOSIS AND ACUPUNCTURE) AFFECT HEALTH, RESILIENCY, AND WELL-BEING. A THIRD KEY GOAL IS TO DEVELOP NEW AND IMPROVED RESEARCH METHODS AND TOOLS FOR CONDUCTING RIGOROUS STUDIES OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES AND THEIR INTEGRATION INTO HEALTH CARE. THESE NEW METHODS COULD CATALYZE ADVANCES IN NATURAL PRODUCT METHODOLOGY AND SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL TECHNOLOGY AND INSTRUMENTS TO CARRY OUT RIGOROUS RESEARCH ON SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT AND FUNCTIONAL CHANGES PRIMARILY FOR MIND AND BODY APPROACHES. TO IMPROVE CARE FOR HARD -TO-MANAGE SYMPTOMS SUCH AS PAIN, ANXIETY, AND DEPRESSION, BOTH MIND AND BODY PRACTICES AND NATURAL PRODUCTS WILL BE RIGOROUSLY STUDIED USING WELL-ESTABLISHED METHODOLOGY. NCCIH WILL ALSO SUPPORT STUDIES IN ""REAL WORLD"" CLINICAL SETTINGS TO TEST THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES, INCLUDING THEIR INTEGRATION INTO HEALTH CARE. INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR PLAYS A KEY ROLE IN HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION. IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED THAT ADOPTING AND MAINTAINING HEALTHY BEHAVIORS (E.G., DIET AND EXERCISE) AND MODIFYING UNHEALTHY BEHAVIORS REDUCES RISKS OF MAJOR CHRONIC DISEASES. NCCIH WILL INVESTIGATE MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH APPROACHES IN HEALTH RESILIENCE AND PRACTICES THAT IMPROVE HEALTH AND PREVENT DISEASE. THESE APPROACHES WILL BE STUDIED ACROSS THE LIFESPAN AND IN DIVERSE POPULATIONS. NCCIH WILL ALSO EXPLORE RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES TO STUDY AND ACCESS THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES IN NONCLINICAL SETTINGS SUCH AS COMMUNITY- AND EMPLOYER-BASED WELLNESS PROGRAMS. TOP SCIENTIFIC PRIORITIES THE TOP SCIENTIFIC PRIORITIES INCLUDE THE NONPHARMACOLOGIC MANAGEMENT OF PAIN, NEUROBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND MECHANISMS, INNOVATIVE APPROACHES FOR ESTABLISHING BIOLOGICAL SIGNATURES OF NATURAL PRODUCTS, DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION ACROSS THE LIFESPAN, AND CLINICAL TRIALS UTILIZING INNOVATIVE STUDY DESIGNS TO ACCESS COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES AND THEIR INTEGRATION INTO HEALTH CARE. PAIN IS THE CONDITION FOR WHICH ADULTS IN THE UNITED STATES MOST OFTEN USE COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH APPROACHES. GROWING EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT SOME COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES MAY HELP IN ITS TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT. DISCOVERING THE MECHANISMS BY WHICH A COMPLEMENTARY APPROACH EXERTS ITS EFFECTS COULD HELP IN THE DESIGN OF BETTER TREATMENTS AND PREDICT WHICH PEOPLE ARE MOST LIKELY TO RESPOND. WHETHER AND HOW COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES DIRECTLY MODULATE OR MODIFY THE STRUCTURE AND/OR THE FUNCTION OF THE ENTIRE OR PART OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM REMAINS UNDERSTUDIED. ADVANCES IN GENOMICS, NEUROSCIENCE, STEM CELLS, SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, AND NEUROIMAGING OFFER EXCELLENT CONCEPTUAL RESOURCES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR INNOVATIVE AND IMPACTFUL MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES. THE PURPOSE OF INNOVATIVE APPROACHES FOR ESTABLISHING BIOLOGICAL SIGNATURES OF NATURAL PRODUCTS IS TO ADVANCE THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE BIOLOGIC ACTIVITY OF COMPLEX NATURAL PRODUCTS BROADLY WITH AN EMPHASIS ON DETERMINING METABOLIC PROFILES. THERE HAS BEEN A GROWING INTEREST IN THE USE OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES FOR THE PREVENTION OF MENTAL, EMOTIONAL, AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS AND FOR THE PROMOTION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH, WELL-BEING, AND RESILIENCE. HOWEVER, THE EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF COMPLEMENTARY MODALITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION IS MODEST. RIGOROUSLY DESIGNED, DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE STUDIES ARE NEEDED TO DETERMINE THE EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPLEMENTARY HEALTH APPROACHES FOR HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION ACROSS THE LIFESPAN. EARLY STAGE AND NEW INVESTIGATORS NCCIH IS STRONGLY COMMITTED TO ASSISTING NEW AND EARLY STAGE INVESTIGATORS IN ESTABLISHING A RESEARCH CAREER. EARLY STAGE INVESTIGATORS ARE THOSE WITHIN 10 YEARS OF COMPLETING THEIR TERMINAL RESEARCH DEGREE, OR THEIR MEDICAL RESIDENCY, OR ITS EQUIVALENT. NEW INVESTIGATORS ARE THOSE WHO HAVE YET TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY FOR A SUBSTANTIAL (E.G., R01) NIH RESEARCH GRANT. EACH ADVISORY COUNCIL ROUND, BASED ON AVAILABLE FUNDS, NCCIH: 1) WILL CONSIDER EARLY STAGE OR NEW INVESTIGATOR STATUS AS ONE OF THE CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATING GRANT APPLICATIONS AS BEING OF HIGH PROGRAM PRIORITY AND 2) MAY MAKE ADDITIONAL R01 GRANT AWARDS TO NEW AND EARLY STAGE INVESTIGATORS WITH PERCENTILES OR SCORES OUT OF PAYLINE ORDER. NCCIH CONTINUES TO ACCEPT APPLICATIONS IN AREAS NOT LISTED AS A SPECIFIC PRIORITY AREA VIA THE INVESTIGATOR INITIATED FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES. ALL INVESTIGATORS ARE URGED TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS WITH THE RELEVANT NCCIH PROGRAM OFFICER (HTTPS://NCCIH.NIH.GOV/TOOLS/EMAILPROGRAMOFFICERS)
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
New York,
New York
100165802
United States
Geographic Scope
Single Zip Code
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the total obligations have increased 382% from $720,287 to $3,472,921.
New York University was awarded
Neural Mechanisms & Sex Differences in MBSR Response for GAD
Project Grant R01AT011257
worth $3,472,921
from National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health in July 2021 with work to be completed primarily in New York New York United States.
The grant
has a duration of 4 years 9 months and
was awarded through assistance program 93.213 Research and Training in Complementary and Integrative Health.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity Fundamental Science Research on Mind and Body Approaches (R01 - Clinical Trial Optional).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 4/21/25
Period of Performance
7/15/21
Start Date
4/30/26
End Date
Funding Split
$3.5M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$3.5M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Subgrant Awards
Disclosed subgrants for R01AT011257
Transaction History
Modifications to R01AT011257
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01AT011257
SAI Number
R01AT011257-2963523354
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Private Institution Of Higher Education
Awarding Office
75NY00 NIH National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health
Funding Office
75NY00 NIH National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health
Awardee UEI
M5SZJ6VHUHN8
Awardee CAGE
3D476
Performance District
NY-12
Senators
Kirsten Gillibrand
Charles Schumer
Charles Schumer
Budget Funding
| Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institute of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0896) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $1,426,166 | 100% |
Modified: 4/21/25