R01AG078242
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
A randomized clinical trial of scenario planning for older adults with serious injury - Abstract
For older adults, poor communication about serious injury and life-limiting illness has consequences for patients and families, clinicians, and healthcare systems. Afflicting 500,000 older adults annually, treatment for traumatic injury frequently involves burdensome interventions (like prolonged life support), major changes in functional or cognitive status, and high mortality. Surgeons use mortality statistics to communicate about the gravity of illness, but current communication standards often lead to goal discordant care, moral distress for clinicians, and prolongation of the dying process.
Given high treatment burdens and frequency of poor prognosis, seriously injured older adults would benefit from communication interventions that clarify patients' goals, alleviate conflict in the ICU, and reduce unwanted invasive procedures for dying patients.
A randomized clinical trial of scenario planning for older adults with serious injury is a 5-year R01 clinical trial that responds specifically to NOSI-AG-20-041 for evaluation of decision support tools and communication aids for seriously ill older patients and their surrogate decision-makers to achieve goal-concordant care. We have developed a novel communication tool called Best Case/Worst Case-ICU that uses scenario planning—narrative description of plausible futures—and a graphic aid to illustrate information about the patient's care trajectory and overall prognosis for daily use in the trauma ICU. We pilot tested this intervention and found that surgeons can use this tool to support families and it may improve quality of communication and reduce clinician moral distress. We are now ready to test the intervention in a large-scale effectiveness study.
We propose a pragmatic multisite randomized clinical trial following 4,500 older adults with traumatic injury. We aim to test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU intervention on quality of communication (AIM 1), clinician moral distress (AIM 2), and length of stay in the ICU (AIM 3). This award will allow us to test an intervention that is easily scalable and can be disseminated rapidly for use with older adults with serious illness.
The research is innovative because it tests scenario planning—a decision-making strategy that has been successfully applied in business and government—but is not widely used in healthcare. The research is significant because, if we demonstrate effectiveness, it has the potential to transform how surgeons and other ICU clinicians talk with patients and families about treatment and prognosis and dramatically improve care older adults receive in the trauma ICU.
Our multidisciplinary team has a long history of collaboration and is well positioned to achieve our objectives. The feasibility of this study is enhanced by support from the Coalition for National Trauma Research, which comprises the major trauma professional organizations in the United States and uses the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program as a data collection platform.
For older adults, poor communication about serious injury and life-limiting illness has consequences for patients and families, clinicians, and healthcare systems. Afflicting 500,000 older adults annually, treatment for traumatic injury frequently involves burdensome interventions (like prolonged life support), major changes in functional or cognitive status, and high mortality. Surgeons use mortality statistics to communicate about the gravity of illness, but current communication standards often lead to goal discordant care, moral distress for clinicians, and prolongation of the dying process.
Given high treatment burdens and frequency of poor prognosis, seriously injured older adults would benefit from communication interventions that clarify patients' goals, alleviate conflict in the ICU, and reduce unwanted invasive procedures for dying patients.
A randomized clinical trial of scenario planning for older adults with serious injury is a 5-year R01 clinical trial that responds specifically to NOSI-AG-20-041 for evaluation of decision support tools and communication aids for seriously ill older patients and their surrogate decision-makers to achieve goal-concordant care. We have developed a novel communication tool called Best Case/Worst Case-ICU that uses scenario planning—narrative description of plausible futures—and a graphic aid to illustrate information about the patient's care trajectory and overall prognosis for daily use in the trauma ICU. We pilot tested this intervention and found that surgeons can use this tool to support families and it may improve quality of communication and reduce clinician moral distress. We are now ready to test the intervention in a large-scale effectiveness study.
We propose a pragmatic multisite randomized clinical trial following 4,500 older adults with traumatic injury. We aim to test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU intervention on quality of communication (AIM 1), clinician moral distress (AIM 2), and length of stay in the ICU (AIM 3). This award will allow us to test an intervention that is easily scalable and can be disseminated rapidly for use with older adults with serious illness.
The research is innovative because it tests scenario planning—a decision-making strategy that has been successfully applied in business and government—but is not widely used in healthcare. The research is significant because, if we demonstrate effectiveness, it has the potential to transform how surgeons and other ICU clinicians talk with patients and families about treatment and prognosis and dramatically improve care older adults receive in the trauma ICU.
Our multidisciplinary team has a long history of collaboration and is well positioned to achieve our objectives. The feasibility of this study is enhanced by support from the Coalition for National Trauma Research, which comprises the major trauma professional organizations in the United States and uses the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program as a data collection platform.
Awardee
Funding Goals
TO ENCOURAGE BIOMEDICAL, SOCIAL, AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH AND RESEARCH TRAINING DIRECTED TOWARD GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF THE AGING PROCESS AND THE DISEASES, SPECIAL PROBLEMS, AND NEEDS OF PEOPLE AS THEY AGE. THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING HAS ESTABLISHED PROGRAMS TO PURSUE THESE GOALS. THE DIVISION OF AGING BIOLOGY EMPHASIZES UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES OF AGING. THE DIVISION OF GERIATRICS AND CLINICAL GERONTOLOGY SUPPORTS RESEARCH TO IMPROVE THE ABILITIES OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS TO RESPOND TO THE DISEASES AND OTHER CLINICAL PROBLEMS OF OLDER PEOPLE. THE DIVISION OF BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS RESEARCH THAT WILL LEAD TO GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOCIAL, CULTURAL, ECONOMIC AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT AFFECT BOTH THE PROCESS OF GROWING OLD AND THE PLACE OF OLDER PEOPLE IN SOCIETY. THE DIVISION OF NEUROSCIENCE FOSTERS RESEARCH CONCERNED WITH THE AGE-RELATED CHANGES IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AS WELL AS THE RELATED SENSORY, PERCEPTUAL, AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH AGING AND HAS A SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM: TO EXPAND AND IMPROVE THE SBIR PROGRAM, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, TO INCREASE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION. SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAM: TO STIMULATE AND FOSTER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CARRIED OUT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO FOSTER TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION.
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
Madison,
Wisconsin
537920001
United States
Geographic Scope
Single Zip Code
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the total obligations have increased 313% from $742,157 to $3,063,146.
University Of Wisconsin System was awarded
Scenario Planning for Older Adults with Serious Injury
Project Grant R01AG078242
worth $3,063,146
from National Institute on Aging in September 2022 with work to be completed primarily in Madison Wisconsin United States.
The grant
has a duration of 4 years 9 months and
was awarded through assistance program 93.866 Aging Research.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity Research Project Grant (Parent R01 Clinical Trial Required).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 7/25/25
Period of Performance
9/30/22
Start Date
6/30/27
End Date
Funding Split
$3.1M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$3.1M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Subgrant Awards
Disclosed subgrants for R01AG078242
Transaction History
Modifications to R01AG078242
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01AG078242
SAI Number
R01AG078242-3973269484
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Public/State Controlled Institution Of Higher Education
Awarding Office
75NN00 NIH National Insitute on Aging
Funding Office
75NN00 NIH National Insitute on Aging
Awardee UEI
LCLSJAGTNZQ7
Awardee CAGE
09FZ2
Performance District
WI-02
Senators
Tammy Baldwin
Ron Johnson
Ron Johnson
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0843) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $1,603,724 | 100% |
Modified: 7/25/25