R01AG074983
Project Grant
Overview
Grant Description
Safety/Tolerability/Immunogenicity of First-in-Human Aβ DNA Vaccine, AV-1959D Phase 1 Trials in Early-Stage AD Subjects: Based on IND18953 Cleared by FDA - Project Summary
Recent data from clinical trials with humanized or fully human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting Aβ suggest that immunotherapy could clear/reduce brain amyloid plaques and even slow cognitive decline in vaccinated subjects when initiated as a preventive measure. However, passive immunotherapy with even the most effective anti-Aβ mAb is not practical and cost-effective as a preventive measure in healthy subjects due to the need for frequent (monthly) administrations of high concentrations (~800mg IV injections/each time) of this immunotherapeutic in a substantial patient population. At the same time, high doses of mAb frequently (~30%) induce ARIA-E and ARIA-H.
In contrast, AD vaccine, similar to the vast majority of vaccines in general, could be very effective when used as a preventive/early intervention measure. Today, only limited results are available from ACC001, CAD106, and UB311 epitope vaccine clinical trials, but fortunately, comprehensive data on AN-1792 are published. These data demonstrated that the AN-1792 vaccine has induced antibodies specific to the N-terminus of amyloid in ~19% immunized AD patients without causing ARIA-E and ARIA-H abnormalities. Importantly, the follow-up analysis revealed that even after 14 years post-vaccination, the vaccinated subjects were plaque-free, and there was a significant inverse correlation between peripheral blood anti-Aβ antibody titers and the plaque counts. Despite the reduction of Aβ pathology, vaccination did not improve cognitive functions likely due to tau pathology buildup.
These data support our long-standing proposal of starting anti-Aβ vaccination with AV-1959D as a prophylactic measure in subjects at risk for AD to inhibit/reduce oligomerization of Aβ and delay downstream pathological processes. However, based on an ethical imperative raised by the FDA during our pre-IND meeting, they recommended us to test our Aβ vaccine AV-1959D in participants with early-stage AD patients prior to initiating the preventive trials in asymptomatic people at risk of MCI/AD.
Therefore, here we propose to initiate a Phase 1 safety trial with the first-in-human Aβ DNA vaccine, AV-1959D, in early-stage MCI/AD patients based on FDA cleared IND18953 developed under an NIA cooperative agreement (U01 AG048310). Importantly, our vaccine strategy differs from all previous or current vaccines tested in clinical trials, as our approach is based on the very immunogenic and proprietary multitep platform designed for human use and aimed to (i) overcome self-tolerance by inducing TH cell responses to multitep, but not to self-Aβ epitopes; (ii) diminish variability of immune responses due to HLA diversity in humans; (iii) augment anti-Aβ antibody production through activation of both naïve and pre-existing memory TH cells, especially beneficial for elderly patients with immunosenescence.
Therefore, in Phase 1 trials, the first-in-human multitep-based DNA vaccine targeting Aβ1-11 B cell epitope should be safe and should induce therapeutically sufficient titers of anti-Aβ antibodies in an appreciable number of vaccinated early-stage AD subjects. Our future program includes preventive vaccine trial in asymptomatic people at risk of MCI/AD using only the most immunogenic and safe dose of AV-1959D.
Recent data from clinical trials with humanized or fully human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting Aβ suggest that immunotherapy could clear/reduce brain amyloid plaques and even slow cognitive decline in vaccinated subjects when initiated as a preventive measure. However, passive immunotherapy with even the most effective anti-Aβ mAb is not practical and cost-effective as a preventive measure in healthy subjects due to the need for frequent (monthly) administrations of high concentrations (~800mg IV injections/each time) of this immunotherapeutic in a substantial patient population. At the same time, high doses of mAb frequently (~30%) induce ARIA-E and ARIA-H.
In contrast, AD vaccine, similar to the vast majority of vaccines in general, could be very effective when used as a preventive/early intervention measure. Today, only limited results are available from ACC001, CAD106, and UB311 epitope vaccine clinical trials, but fortunately, comprehensive data on AN-1792 are published. These data demonstrated that the AN-1792 vaccine has induced antibodies specific to the N-terminus of amyloid in ~19% immunized AD patients without causing ARIA-E and ARIA-H abnormalities. Importantly, the follow-up analysis revealed that even after 14 years post-vaccination, the vaccinated subjects were plaque-free, and there was a significant inverse correlation between peripheral blood anti-Aβ antibody titers and the plaque counts. Despite the reduction of Aβ pathology, vaccination did not improve cognitive functions likely due to tau pathology buildup.
These data support our long-standing proposal of starting anti-Aβ vaccination with AV-1959D as a prophylactic measure in subjects at risk for AD to inhibit/reduce oligomerization of Aβ and delay downstream pathological processes. However, based on an ethical imperative raised by the FDA during our pre-IND meeting, they recommended us to test our Aβ vaccine AV-1959D in participants with early-stage AD patients prior to initiating the preventive trials in asymptomatic people at risk of MCI/AD.
Therefore, here we propose to initiate a Phase 1 safety trial with the first-in-human Aβ DNA vaccine, AV-1959D, in early-stage MCI/AD patients based on FDA cleared IND18953 developed under an NIA cooperative agreement (U01 AG048310). Importantly, our vaccine strategy differs from all previous or current vaccines tested in clinical trials, as our approach is based on the very immunogenic and proprietary multitep platform designed for human use and aimed to (i) overcome self-tolerance by inducing TH cell responses to multitep, but not to self-Aβ epitopes; (ii) diminish variability of immune responses due to HLA diversity in humans; (iii) augment anti-Aβ antibody production through activation of both naïve and pre-existing memory TH cells, especially beneficial for elderly patients with immunosenescence.
Therefore, in Phase 1 trials, the first-in-human multitep-based DNA vaccine targeting Aβ1-11 B cell epitope should be safe and should induce therapeutically sufficient titers of anti-Aβ antibodies in an appreciable number of vaccinated early-stage AD subjects. Our future program includes preventive vaccine trial in asymptomatic people at risk of MCI/AD using only the most immunogenic and safe dose of AV-1959D.
Awardee
Funding Goals
TO ENCOURAGE BIOMEDICAL, SOCIAL, AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH AND RESEARCH TRAINING DIRECTED TOWARD GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF THE AGING PROCESS AND THE DISEASES, SPECIAL PROBLEMS, AND NEEDS OF PEOPLE AS THEY AGE. THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING HAS ESTABLISHED PROGRAMS TO PURSUE THESE GOALS. THE DIVISION OF AGING BIOLOGY EMPHASIZES UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES OF AGING. THE DIVISION OF GERIATRICS AND CLINICAL GERONTOLOGY SUPPORTS RESEARCH TO IMPROVE THE ABILITIES OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS TO RESPOND TO THE DISEASES AND OTHER CLINICAL PROBLEMS OF OLDER PEOPLE. THE DIVISION OF BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS RESEARCH THAT WILL LEAD TO GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOCIAL, CULTURAL, ECONOMIC AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT AFFECT BOTH THE PROCESS OF GROWING OLD AND THE PLACE OF OLDER PEOPLE IN SOCIETY. THE DIVISION OF NEUROSCIENCE FOSTERS RESEARCH CONCERNED WITH THE AGE-RELATED CHANGES IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AS WELL AS THE RELATED SENSORY, PERCEPTUAL, AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH AGING AND HAS A SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM: TO EXPAND AND IMPROVE THE SBIR PROGRAM, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, TO INCREASE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION. SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAM: TO STIMULATE AND FOSTER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION THROUGH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CARRIED OUT BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO FOSTER TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER BETWEEN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, TO INCREASE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS DERIVED FROM FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS AND WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION.
Grant Program (CFDA)
Awarding / Funding Agency
Place of Performance
California
United States
Geographic Scope
State-Wide
Related Opportunity
Analysis Notes
Amendment Since initial award the total obligations have increased 285% from $2,680,709 to $10,320,460.
Institute For Molecular Medicine was awarded
AV-1959D Phase 1 Trials in Early-Stage AD Subjects
Project Grant R01AG074983
worth $10,320,460
from National Institute on Aging in February 2022 with work to be completed primarily in California United States.
The grant
has a duration of 5 years and
was awarded through assistance program 93.866 Aging Research.
The Project Grant was awarded through grant opportunity Early Stage Clinical Trials for the Spectrum of Alzheimers Disease and Age-related Cognitive Decline (R01 Clinical Trial Optional).
Status
(Ongoing)
Last Modified 6/20/25
Period of Performance
2/15/22
Start Date
1/31/27
End Date
Funding Split
$10.3M
Federal Obligation
$0.0
Non-Federal Obligation
$10.3M
Total Obligated
Activity Timeline
Transaction History
Modifications to R01AG074983
Additional Detail
Award ID FAIN
R01AG074983
SAI Number
R01AG074983-405069835
Award ID URI
SAI UNAVAILABLE
Awardee Classifications
Nonprofit With 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other Than An Institution Of Higher Education)
Awarding Office
75NN00 NIH National Insitute on Aging
Funding Office
75NN00 NIH National Insitute on Aging
Awardee UEI
D4H1F8KMJJ28
Awardee CAGE
4C3Z9
Performance District
CA-90
Senators
Dianne Feinstein
Alejandro Padilla
Alejandro Padilla
Budget Funding
Federal Account | Budget Subfunction | Object Class | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services (075-0843) | Health research and training | Grants, subsidies, and contributions (41.0) | $5,788,326 | 100% |
Modified: 6/20/25