Search Documents
C2E Virtual Industry Day Q and As.pdf
Posted: May 12, 2023
• Type: .pdf
• Size: 0.16MB
C2E Virtual Industry Day Q and As.pdf | May 12, 2023
- C2E Virtual Industry Day Q and As.pdf | May 12, 2023
- C2E Industry Day Participants Listing.xlsx | April 7, 2023
- Final C2E Industry Engagement Day Presentation_20 March 2023.pdf | April 7, 2023
- REC and WEC Original SOW dated June 2016.pdf | February 16, 2023
- Tentative C2E Agenda .pdf | February 16, 2023
- No elements found. Consider changing the search query.
Submit Questions to Government Officer Anonymously
Place your question(s) below. One of our analysts will anonymously submit the question(s) within 8 hours and provide any responses via email once received.
Question & Answer Assistant
Hello! Please let me know your question about this document. I will answer based on the related documents for this opportunity.
Some suggestions:
I'd like to anonymously submit a question to the procurement officer(s)
Loading
Overview
Related Opportunity
Related Agency
Summary
compilation of questions and answers from the C2E Virtual Industry Day general session and one-on-one sessions. Key points include clarification on the C2E ceiling for centralized and decentralized ordering, absence of project cost thresholds for decentralized ordering, availability of PowerPoint slides but not recordings, consideration of small business set-asides for projects above $50m, potential use of cost-type CLINs for task orders, and uncertainty regarding evaluation criteria, pricing methodology, and number of awards.
Additionally, it addresses the potential inclusion of economic price adjustment clauses, exclusion of military family housing from the scope, emphasis on historic facility projects, and the need for specific security clearances based on project requirements. The document also highlights ongoing market research to finalize various aspects such as evaluation criteria and award determinations.
Additionally, it addresses the potential inclusion of economic price adjustment clauses, exclusion of military family housing from the scope, emphasis on historic facility projects, and the need for specific security clearances based on project requirements. The document also highlights ongoing market research to finalize various aspects such as evaluation criteria and award determinations.
Show All