DOCUMENT

Attachment 12 - KEOS Virtual Industry Day Brief.pdf

OVERVIEW

Original Source
Contract Opportunity
Posted
Aug. 14, 2020
Type
.pdf
Size
3.21MB

DOCUMENT PREVIEW

EXTRACTED TEXT

UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESIndustry Day Instructions / InformationMeeting will be Audio only Disruptive participants and those with unmuted mics may be dropped from the meetingQuestions will NOT be permitted during this briefing. All questions shall be submitted in writing to KEOS POCs NLT Noon MDT 7 August 2020When joining: Ensure your microphone is muted. Do not unmute your microphone at any pointIn the chat, post your company name, one e-mail address, and list ALL attendee names for attendancePlease note that this WebEx service allows audio and other information sent during the session to be recorded, which may be discoverable in a legal matter. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to being recorded, you may exit the session.As of 5 Aug 2020Slide 1 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 2IntroductionsGary SchneiderDirector, Base Civil Engineer DivisionCharles Van SlykeDeputy,Base CivilEngineerDivisionLeon BarosChief,CE Operating ServicesJoseph LujanProject Officer, CE Operating ServicesJennifer WilterdinkContractingOfficer,377 MSG/PKCRichard Odame Contracting Specialist, 377 MSG/PKC UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 3OverviewWelcome and Introductions377thMSG/CE Opening RemarksKirtland Engineering Operations Services (KEOS) FOPR Overview377thABW Mission VideoKEOS PWS OverviewBreak KEOS PWS Virtual Base TourClosing Remarks UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 4377th MSG Civil Engineer DivisionGary J. SchneiderBase Civil Engineer377th Civil Engineer DivisionKEOSIndustry Day BriefingBCE Opening Remarks UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 5Kirtland Engineering Operations ServicesContracting OverviewJennifer Wilterdink, Contracting Officer377 MSG/PKC5 August 2020 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESContracting Points of ContactUse beta.SAM.govfor gaining your information relative to this requirement as it will always contain the most updated informationWhen corresponding via e-mail, contact boththe Contract Specialist AND the Contracting Officer Contracting Officer: Jennifer Wilterdinkjennifer.wilterdink@us.af.mil505-846-0280Contract Specialist: Lt. Richard Odamerichard.odame.1@us.af.mil 505-846-9062As of 5 Aug 2020Slide 6 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESRules of EngagementContracting Office (377 MSG/PK) is the POC for all informationAll questions for which Offerors desire an official answer must be submitted in writing NLT Noon MDT 7 August 2020 Questions will not be answered during this briefingAttendanceis MANDATORY for all offerors submitting proposals, so please ensure we have your attendance recordedAs of 5 Aug 2020Slide 7 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAcquisition StrategyAcquisition Strategy SummaryNon-Commercial, FAR Part 16.5 Fair Opportunity selection under the General Services Administration (GSA) One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) Small Business Pool 1 contractCompetitive Small Business SetAsideContract Type:Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type with Firm FixedPrice (FFP) and Cost Reimbursable (CR) CLINsPeriod of Performance:8 years (1 base year and 7 option years)Single Task Order Award in accordance with (IAW) OASIS Basic Contract Ordering and Fair Opportunity Proposal Request (FOPR) ProceduresAs of 5 Aug 2020Slide 8 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESCLIN StructureCLINDescriptionType0001Grounds MaintenanceFFP0002Management and General ServicesCPFF0003Engineering ServicesCPFF0004Installation Management ServicesCPFF0005Emergency ManagementCPFF0006Operations EngineeringCPFF0007Facility ProjectsCPFF0008Parts, Materials, ServiceCR0009UtilitiesCR0010PropaneCR0011Travel and TrainingCR0012Contract Access Fee (CAFCR0013Mobilization and TransitionFFPBase Year plus seven (7) Option yearsAs of 5 Aug 2020Slide 9 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESClause H001 Monthly Performance StandardsAs of 5 Aug 2020Slide 10 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESSource Selection ProceduresEvaluation Criteria: Factor 1: StaffingSubfactor 1: Organization Chart/Proposed Team ComplimentSubfactor 2: Key Personnel QualificationsFactor 2: TechnicalSubfactor 1: Training Program and Knowledge TransferSubfactor 2: Engineering Services Subfactor 3: Operations ServicesSubfactor 4: Real PropertySubfactor 5: Emergency Management Factor 3: Cost/PriceReasonable, Realistic, and BalancedAs of 5 Aug 2020Slide 11 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESEvaluation ProcessEvaluation (Three Phases):Phase IAll offerors will be comparatively evaluated for Factor 1: Staffing.Phase IIThe four (4) highest rated offerors for Factor 1 will be comparatively evaluated for Factor 2: Technical.Phase IIIThe two (2) highest rated offerors for Technical will be evaluated for Factor 3: Cost/Price. The Government reserves the right to evaluate more than 2 proposals against the cost/price factor to determine the best valueThe Best Value assessment allows for a tradeoff between non-cost factors and cost/price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the most highly rated technical proposal to achieve a best-value task order award.Relative Importance of Factors:Staffing is more important than Technical, which is more important than cost/price; however, cost/price will contribute substantially to the award decision.As of 5 Aug 2020Slide 12 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESEvaluation ProcessComparative Analysis: For Factors 1 and 2, the Government will perform a comparative analysis (comparing Offeror proposals to one another) in order to select the Offeror that is best suited to fulfill the requirements of the FOPR. The comparative analysis will be based on the Offerors responses to the Staffing, Technical and Cost/Price Factors, given their stated relative order of importance. Offerors who meet or exceed the Governments stated requirements will be ranked according to the comparative analysis. This ranking will determine whether an offeror is highly ranked enough to move to the next factor for evaluation. An offer will be ranked based on how it meets or exceeds the minimum requirements, what advantages it presents to the Government, and how those advantages compare to other offers. Failure to meet the minimum qualifications will result in an offeror being ineligible for award. The proposal that meets all evaluation criteria across allfactors and is determined to provide the best value will be considered most advantageous to the government.As of 5 Aug 2020Slide 13 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIES377 ABW Mission Video Mission VideoAs of 5 Aug 2020Slide 14 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 15Kirtland Engineering Operations ServicesPWS OverviewJoseph Lujan, Project Officer377 MSG/CENB5 August 2020 UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 16KEOS PWS Overview PWS StructurePWS Sections Key Areas UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 17KEOS PWS StructurePWS StructureDescriptionof Services and Scope of Requirements (specifics of what services are to be performed)Directives/guidance (further regulatory definition of scope)Personnel requirements (education/certification/experience)Security Personnel Clearance RequirementsMinimum Team Complement (MTC)Key PersonnelPWS submittals and work products requirements (records, plans, programsetc.)Performance objectives/thresholds (how will performance be measured) UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 18KEOS PWS SectionsPWS SectionsGeneral Services (Section D)Engineering Services(Section E)Installation ManagementServices (Section F)Operations Services (Section G)Emergency Management Services (Section H)AnnexesIncludes various work requirements information and dataArenot sequentially referenced/labeled, e.g. Annex references will jump from W2-9 to W2-12. UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 19PWS Sections (cont.)General Services (Section D)Mission Essential Contractor ServicesPlace of PerformanceSafety Management SystemQuality Control Inspection and Surveillance SystemGovernment Security Management SupportContractor Participation in Government Inspections and ExercisesContractorTraining ProgramContractPhase-In (Mobilization/Transition)Includes 8 Performance Objectives Includes 23Submittals in Annex W1-3 KEOS Submittals UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 20Engineering Services (SectionE)General Engineering ServicesInstallation Planning and ProgrammingEnergy ManagementProject Management and ExecutionProcurement PackagesEngineering Cost EstimatingInstallation Comprehensive Planning/Community PlanningEngineering Activities ManagementIncludes 31 Performance ObjectivesIncludes 72 Submittals in Annex W1-3 KEOS Submittals PWS Sections (cont.) UnclassifiedNUCLEAR LOGISTICS* STRONG PARTNERSHIPS* AIRMEN & FAMILIESAs Of: 5 AUG 2020Slide 21Installation Management Services (Section F)InformationTechnology ManagementControlSystems (CS) (Industrial Control Systems) ManagementReal Property ManagementEnvironmental ComplianceEnvironmental