Search Documents
No Results Found.
No Results Found.
ASTRO Virtual Industry Day QandA.pdf
Posted: Aug. 12, 2021
• Type: .pdf
• Size: 0.44MB
Submit Questions to Government Officer Anonymously
Place your question(s) below. One of our analysts will anonymously submit the question(s) within 8 hours and provide any responses via email once received.
Opportunity Assistant
Hello! Please let me know your questions about this document.
Loading
Save a Question
Customize Proposal Generation
We will write a draft based on the below linked information. Add or link more information to improve the draft.
Federal Profile
Select the Federal company profile to use when informing the response based on publicly available data.
Loading federal profile search...
Company Context
Add capability statements, prior responses, or other company materials.
Checking for company documents...
Opportunity Context
Add SOWs, attachments, or other files specific to this opportunity.
Checking for opportunity documents...
Link a Pursuit
Optionally associate this draft with an existing pursuit.
Overview
Related Opportunity
Related Agency
Summary
Q&A summary from an ASTRO Virtual Industry Day. It addresses various questions related to the ASTRO contract, including:
- Availability of slides and recordings for proposers
- Relationship between ASTRO and Silversword
- Flow down of TS-SCI requirements to subcontractors
- Synergies with SOR
- Expectations for site collaboration
- Release of industry attendee lists
- Data sets for demonstrations
- OCI concerns with AMOS BOS contract
- Lease of Lipoa Parkway site
- Personnel restrictions on site
- Partnerships enabled by attendee lists
- Site visits
- Acquisition timeline updates
- Office and technical space availability for primes and subs
- Data accessibility over classified networks
- Proposing experiments against strategic priorities
- Bidders library setup
- Key positions like Certified Laser Safety Officer
- Satisfaction with experiment implementation by AFRL and Space Force
- Availability of strategic priority documents to bidders
- Award date clarification
- Feedback deadlines on draft RFPs
- Prioritized modernization projects list or anticipation by contractors
Additionally, it covers ODC baselining based on past expenditures, evaluation of offerors' technical capabilities based on BOE submissions for TO 3 Sub Factor 1 response only if providing BOE for a single project is required from each offeror and critical sub; past performance write-ups requirements for offerors and critical subs in final RFP Sections L and M; funding sources beyond 6.1-6.3 categories; one-on-one meetings absence due to tight timeline but potential for discussions as per final RFP provisions.
- Availability of slides and recordings for proposers
- Relationship between ASTRO and Silversword
- Flow down of TS-SCI requirements to subcontractors
- Synergies with SOR
- Expectations for site collaboration
- Release of industry attendee lists
- Data sets for demonstrations
- OCI concerns with AMOS BOS contract
- Lease of Lipoa Parkway site
- Personnel restrictions on site
- Partnerships enabled by attendee lists
- Site visits
- Acquisition timeline updates
- Office and technical space availability for primes and subs
- Data accessibility over classified networks
- Proposing experiments against strategic priorities
- Bidders library setup
- Key positions like Certified Laser Safety Officer
- Satisfaction with experiment implementation by AFRL and Space Force
- Availability of strategic priority documents to bidders
- Award date clarification
- Feedback deadlines on draft RFPs
- Prioritized modernization projects list or anticipation by contractors
Additionally, it covers ODC baselining based on past expenditures, evaluation of offerors' technical capabilities based on BOE submissions for TO 3 Sub Factor 1 response only if providing BOE for a single project is required from each offeror and critical sub; past performance write-ups requirements for offerors and critical subs in final RFP Sections L and M; funding sources beyond 6.1-6.3 categories; one-on-one meetings absence due to tight timeline but potential for discussions as per final RFP provisions.
Show All