Search Documents
19 AF Industry Day 2 QA 26 Feb21 Government Responses.xlsx
Posted: March 17, 2021
• Type: .xlsx
• Size: 0.04MB
19 AF Industry Day 2 QA_26 Feb21_Government Responses.xlsx | March 17, 2021
- 19 AF Industry Day 1 QA_24 Feb21_Government Responses.xlsx | March 17, 2021
- 19 AF Industry Day 2 QA_26 Feb21_Government Responses.xlsx | March 17, 2021
- 338 ESS 19 AF Industry Day Remarks (002).pdf | February 24, 2021
- Industry Day Brief 5.1.pdf | February 24, 2021
- Industry Day Brief_AO Slides.pdf | February 24, 2021
- No elements found. Consider changing the search query.
Submit Questions to Government Officer Anonymously
Place your question(s) below. One of our analysts will anonymously submit the question(s) within 8 hours and provide any responses via email once received.
Question & Answer Assistant
Hello! Please let me know your question about this document. I will answer based on the related documents for this opportunity.
Some suggestions:
I'd like to anonymously submit a question to the procurement officer(s)
Loading
Overview
Related Opportunity
Related Agency
Summary
compilation of questions and answers from the 19 AF Industry Day 2/338 ESS Q&A session held on February 26, 2021. The document addresses various inquiries related to the Request for Information (RFI) for different initiatives within the Air Education and Training Command (AETC).
Key points include clarification on whether tier-2 contractors can respond to the RFI, the projected period of performance for different initiatives, the number of CIP/CSIs needed across various training missions, and expectations regarding public to private partnerships for facility leases.
Additionally, there are discussions on runway requirements, airfield specifications, syllabus development, environmental impact assessments, and aircraft capabilities such as air refueling and air drops. The document emphasizes industry engagement in providing perspectives on program durations, operational standards, and training methodologies in line with AETC's objectives.
Key points include clarification on whether tier-2 contractors can respond to the RFI, the projected period of performance for different initiatives, the number of CIP/CSIs needed across various training missions, and expectations regarding public to private partnerships for facility leases.
Additionally, there are discussions on runway requirements, airfield specifications, syllabus development, environmental impact assessments, and aircraft capabilities such as air refueling and air drops. The document emphasizes industry engagement in providing perspectives on program durations, operational standards, and training methodologies in line with AETC's objectives.
Show All