Search Contract Opportunities

Operational Defense Effectiveness Assessments for Missile Raid Scenarios

ID: MDA21-008 • Type: SBIR / STTR Topic • Match:  90%
Opportunity Assistant

Hello! Please let me know your questions about this opportunity. I will answer based on the available opportunity documents.

Please sign-in to link federal registration and award history to assistant. Sign in to upload a capability statement or catalogue for your company

Some suggestions:
Please summarize the work to be completed under this opportunity
Do the documents mention an incumbent contractor?
Does this contract have any security clearance requirements?
I'd like to anonymously submit a question to the procurement officer(s)
Loading

Description

RT&L FOCUS AREA(S): Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Information Systems OBJECTIVE: Develop a methodology and computer system that allows analysts to create and display operational defense effectiveness assessments for missile raid scenarios. DESCRIPTION: This topic seeks development of efficient solution techniques to perform operational defense effectiveness assessments for missile raid scenarios. Current operational effectiveness assessments (such as geographic heatmaps) that calculate and display the probability of engagement success across a geographic region (P[ES]), where P[ES] is the probability that a missile threat is successfully intercepted, are often confined to single-threat scenarios. For a single threat, multiple target locations can be evaluated and the P[ES] can be calculated via simulation for each one. By combining these probabilities, a heatmap picture can be constructed showing the relative protection available in different parts of a defended area. Missile raids of multiple simultaneous threats directed at multiple targets can be modeled and simulated, but the simple metrics and clear interpretation of the results for the single threat case are not easily extrapolated to raid scenarios where all threats could target the same location or may target different locations. Evaluating these raid scenarios entails significant mathematical and computational complexity because the combinations of possible threat aimpoints grows exponentially with the number of threats in a raid. This topic desires solutions that provide meaningful metrics, create accompanying efficient solution techniques and support suitable information dispay to perform operational effectiveness assessments for missile raid scenarios. Without loss of generality, assume that the probability of primary interest in a raid evaluation is the probability of a leaker across multiple threats. The concept of simple operational effectiveness assessments, like a geographic heatmap, must be extended to consider how to display the missile defense system effectiveness and performance when defending against raid scenarios. PHASE I: Define meaningful metrics for raid scenarios. Design and develop methods and algorithms for a proof of concept computer system that allows analysts to predict and display the operational effectiveness and performance of the missile defense system against a given missile raid based on a limited number of simulation runs and replications. Demonstrate that the predictions are sufficiently accurate across a geographic region. PHASE II: Expand the methodology and computer system to minimize the computational resources needed to create and display a complete missile raid operational effectiveness assessment. Demonstrate this operational effectiveness assessment for multiple missile raids of varying complexity. Coordinate with the government sponsor during prototype design and development to ensure that the delivered products will be relevant to ongoing and planned missile defense projects. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Scale-up the capability from the prototype utilizing the new hardware and/or software technologies developed in Phase II into a mature, full-scale, field-able capability. Work with missile defense integrators to integrate the technology for a missile defense system level test-bed and test in a relevant environment. REFERENCES: 1. Pavalko, W., K. Chevli, and M. Monius. 2000. Theater Ballistic Missile Defense Analyses. John Hopkins APL Technical Digest 21(2):261-268. ; 2. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2019. 2019 Missile Defense Review (see https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/17/2002080666/-1/-1/1/2019-MISSILE-DEFENSE-REVIEW.PDF accessed: 7 January 2020). ; 3. Ender, T., R. Leurck, B. Weaver, P. Miceli, W. Blair, P. West, and D. Mavris. 2010. Systems-of-Systems Analysis of Ballistic Missile Defense Architecture Effectiveness Through Surrogate Modeling and Simulation. IEEE Systems Journal 4(2):156-166.

Overview

Response Deadline
June 17, 2021 Past Due
Posted
April 21, 2021
Open
May 19, 2021
Set Aside
Small Business (SBA)
Place of Performance
Not Provided
Source
Alt Source

Program
SBIR Phase I / II
Structure
Contract
Phase Detail
Phase I: Establish the technical merit, feasibility, and commercial potential of the proposed R/R&D efforts and determine the quality of performance of the small business awardee organization.
Phase II: Continue the R/R&D efforts initiated in Phase I. Funding is based on the results achieved in Phase I and the scientific and technical merit and commercial potential of the project proposed in Phase II. Typically, only Phase I awardees are eligible for a Phase II award
Duration
6 Months - 1 Year
Size Limit
500 Employees
On 4/21/21 Missile Defense Agency issued SBIR / STTR Topic MDA21-008 for Operational Defense Effectiveness Assessments for Missile Raid Scenarios due 6/17/21.

Documents

Posted documents for SBIR / STTR Topic MDA21-008

Question & Answer

The AI Q&A Assistant has moved to the bottom right of the page

Contract Awards

Prime contracts awarded through SBIR / STTR Topic MDA21-008

Incumbent or Similar Awards

Potential Bidders and Partners

Awardees that have won contracts similar to SBIR / STTR Topic MDA21-008

Similar Active Opportunities

Open contract opportunities similar to SBIR / STTR Topic MDA21-008