Search Contract Opportunities

Finite Element Method (FEM) for Bonded Repair Design

ID: AF193-024 • Type: SBIR / STTR Topic • Match:  95%
Opportunity Assistant

Hello! Please let me know your questions about this opportunity. I will answer based on the available opportunity documents.

Please sign-in to link federal registration and award history to assistant. Sign in to upload a capability statement or catalogue for your company

Some suggestions:
Loading

Description

TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Materials
OBJECTIVE: Develop a repeatable process in which FEM software packages will be effectively and efficiently used to determine the fatigue characteristics of wing structures prior to, and after, the installation Boron and Titanium bolted bonded patches.
DESCRIPTION: The Bonded Repair Center of Excellence (COE) Delegated Engineering Authority (DEA) employs a variety of techniques in the determination of damage extent and optimal repair form. Certain techniques need to be improved upon with the proper utilization of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) tools. The majority of repairs conducted by the bonded repair DEA in recent years, conducted in accordance with T.O. 1-1A-81 and T.O. 1-1-6912, are based on historical, experimental data. The DEA has a need for a repeatable analysis methodology with the ability to estimate crack initiation and propagation under fatigue conditions. This methodology should include high-performance computing programs, such as ANSYS3, incorporating available Finite Element Modeling codes. Utilizing this process will improve the quality and effectiveness of repair designs. Additionally, a quantitative description of damages in the form of material removals would grant the DEA the ability to confidently prepare for unconventional repairs. Proper classroom training specifically for bonded repair of aircraft structures will likely be necessary, and should be developed and administered by the same firm.
FEA offers a convenient means of obtaining several pieces of valuable information significant to understanding structural performance; these pieces of information include, but are not limited to, Von-Mises stress, engineering strain, and stress concentration factors. With this information, the COE can more effectively evaluate the quality of both common fatigue driven wing plank repairs on aircraft and eventually unconventional repairs on weapon systems, as well. As a result, the Bonded Repair COE will be better equipped to develop a vast array of repairs with a higher degree of confidence and accuracy.
PHASE I: Develop a proof of concept, high accuracy, repeatable crack initiation and propagation prediction methodology. In this phase, the methodology will utilize available solid modeling/analysis and FEA software to demonstrate the ability to analyze the available data and predict damage under fatigue conditions. Initial demonstrations may be limited to common fatigue driven wing plank repairs, multiple combinations of a single failure mode, or a combination thereof. Classroom style training should also be prepared and ready to administer.
PHASE II: Develop the repeatable crack initiation and propagation prediction methodology to a deployment ready state. Greater ability to analyze the available data and predict damage under expanded conditions will be implemented, developed processes/models will be validated against current standards. The methodology will utilize the FEA software to provide a quantitative description of damages in the form of material removals, and effectively evaluate the quality and effectiveness of unconventional repairs. The goal of the phase II will be a robust, user friendly methodology useable with available FEA software resulting in measurable improvements in the determination and evaluation of a vast array of bonded repair techniques.
PHASE III: A successful methodology could be marketed to other weapon systems and defense customers who require the ability to analyze and model various bonded repair methods under common and unconventional damage scenarios.
REFERENCES: 1. "AIRCRAFT AND MISSILE REPAIR. STRUCTURAL HARDWARE , Technical Order 1-1A-8, https://sbe85fe43e9b86f2d.jimcontent.com/download/.../1-1A-8%20CHA NGE%203.pdf, 15 February 2006.; 2. CLEANING AND CORROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL, AEROSPACE AND NON-AEROSPACE EQUIPMENT , Technical Order 1-1-691, https://www.robins .af.mil/Portals/59/documents/technicalorders/1-1-691_CHG%2016.pdf?ver=2019-01-25-105433-723, 02 November 2009.; 3. ANSYS Mechanical Pro Capabilities , ANSYS, Inc., https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/ansys-mechanical-pro, 19 February 2019.KEYWORDS: FEA, Repair, Aircraft

Overview

Response Deadline
Oct. 23, 2019 Past Due
Posted
Aug. 23, 2019
Open
Sept. 24, 2019
Set Aside
Small Business (SBA)
Place of Performance
Not Provided
Source
Alt Source

Program
SBIR Phase I / II
Structure
Contract
Phase Detail
Phase I: Establish the technical merit, feasibility, and commercial potential of the proposed R/R&D efforts and determine the quality of performance of the small business awardee organization.
Phase II: Continue the R/R&D efforts initiated in Phase I. Funding is based on the results achieved in Phase I and the scientific and technical merit and commercial potential of the project proposed in Phase II. Typically, only Phase I awardees are eligible for a Phase II award
Duration
6 Months - 1 Year
Size Limit
500 Employees
On 8/23/19 Department of the Air Force issued SBIR / STTR Topic AF193-024 for Finite Element Method (FEM) for Bonded Repair Design due 10/23/19.

Documents

Posted documents for SBIR / STTR Topic AF193-024

Opportunity Assistant


AI Analysis

Contract Awards

Prime contracts awarded through SBIR / STTR Topic AF193-024

Incumbent or Similar Awards

Potential Bidders and Partners

Awardees that have won contracts similar to SBIR / STTR Topic AF193-024

Similar Active Opportunities

Open contract opportunities similar to SBIR / STTR Topic AF193-024

Experts for Finite Element Method (FEM) for Bonded Repair Design

Recommended subject matter experts available for hire